• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成对β多样性解决了计算物种周转率时一个被低估的混淆源。

Pairwise beta diversity resolves an underappreciated source of confusion in calculating species turnover.

机构信息

Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2017 Apr;98(4):933-939. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1753.

DOI:10.1002/ecy.1753
PMID:28134975
Abstract

Beta diversity is an important metric in ecology quantifying differentiation or disparity in composition among communities, ecosystems, or phenotypes. To compare systems with different sizes (N, number of units within a system), beta diversity is often converted to related indices such as turnover or local/regional differentiation. Here we use simulations to demonstrate that these naive measures of dissimilarity depend on sample size and design. We show that when N is the number of sampled units (e.g., quadrats) rather than the "true" number of communities in the system (if such exists), these differentiation measures are biased estimators. We propose using average pairwise dissimilarity as an intuitive solution. That is, instead of attempting to estimate an N-community measure, we advocate estimating the expected dissimilarity between any random pair of communities (or sampling units)-especially when the "true" N is unknown or undefined. Fortunately, measures of pairwise dissimilarity or overlap have been used in ecology for decades, and their properties are well known. Using the same simulations, we show that average pairwise metrics give consistent and unbiased estimates regardless of the number of survey units sampled. We advocate pairwise dissimilarity as a general standardization to ensure commensurability of different study systems.

摘要

β多样性是生态学中的一个重要指标,用于量化群落、生态系统或表型之间组成的差异或离散度。为了比较具有不同大小(N,系统内单位数量)的系统,β多样性通常转换为相关指数,如周转率或局部/区域分化。在这里,我们使用模拟来演示这些简单的不相似性度量依赖于样本量和设计。我们表明,当 N 是采样单元(例如,样方)的数量而不是系统中“真实”社区的数量(如果存在的话)时,这些分化度量是有偏估计量。我们建议使用平均成对不相似性作为直观的解决方案。也就是说,我们不是试图估计 N 个社区的度量,而是主张估计任何两个随机社区(或采样单元)之间的预期不相似性-特别是当“真实”N 未知或未定义时。幸运的是,成对不相似性或重叠的度量在生态学中已经使用了几十年,它们的性质是众所周知的。使用相同的模拟,我们表明,平均成对度量无论采样的调查单元数量如何,都能给出一致和无偏的估计。我们主张使用成对不相似性作为一般标准化方法,以确保不同研究系统的可衡量性。

相似文献

1
Pairwise beta diversity resolves an underappreciated source of confusion in calculating species turnover.成对β多样性解决了计算物种周转率时一个被低估的混淆源。
Ecology. 2017 Apr;98(4):933-939. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1753.
2
Measuring β-diversity with species abundance data.利用物种丰度数据测量β多样性。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):1112-22. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12362. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning.β 多样性作为群落数据的变异性:不相似系数和划分。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Aug;16(8):951-63. doi: 10.1111/ele.12141. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
Individual-based multiple-unit dissimilarity: novel indices and null model for assessing temporal variability in community composition.基于个体的多单位相异性:评估群落组成时间变异性的新指标和零模型。
Oecologia. 2021 Oct;197(2):353-364. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-05025-3. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
5
Reliable estimates of beta diversity with incomplete sampling.具有不完全采样的 Beta 多样性的可靠估计。
Ecology. 2018 May;99(5):1051-1062. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2201. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
6
Quantifying phenological diversity: a framework based on Hill numbers theory.量化物候多样性:基于希尔数理论的框架。
PeerJ. 2022 May 12;10:e13412. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13412. eCollection 2022.
7
A hierarchical Bayesian model to incorporate uncertainty into methods for diversity partitioning.一种将不确定性纳入多样性分割方法的分层贝叶斯模型。
Ecology. 2018 Apr;99(4):947-956. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2174. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Random sampling process leads to overestimation of β-diversity of microbial communities.随机抽样过程导致微生物群落β多样性的高估。
mBio. 2013 Jun 11;4(3):e00324-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00324-13.
9
Functional diversity through the mean trait dissimilarity: resolving shortcomings with existing paradigms and algorithms.通过平均性状差异实现功能多样性:解决现有范式和算法的缺点
Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):933-40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3546-0. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Beta Diversity in a Highly Heterogeneous Area: Disentangling Species and Taxonomic Dissimilarity for Terrestrial Vertebrates.高度异质区域的β多样性:解析陆生脊椎动物的物种和分类学差异
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):e0160438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160438. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes.物种更替无法拯救破碎化景观中的生物多样性。
Nature. 2025 Apr;640(8059):702-706. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08688-7. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
A millennium of increasing diversity of ecosystems until the mid-20th century.一个千年以来生态系统多样性不断增加,直到 20 世纪中期。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Oct;28(20):5945-5955. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16335. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Late quaternary biotic homogenization of North American mammalian faunas.晚第四纪北美哺乳动物区系的生物同质化。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 8;13(1):3940. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31595-8.
4
Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees influence the latitudinal beta-diversity gradient of tree communities in forests worldwide.丛枝菌根树木影响全球森林中树木群落的纬度β多样性梯度。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 25;12(1):3137. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23236-3.
5
Nest substrate, more than ant activity, drives fungal pathogen community dissimilarity in seed-dispersing ant nests.巢基质而非蚂蚁活动驱动了传播种子的蚂蚁巢中真菌病原体群落的差异。
Oecologia. 2020 Dec;194(4):649-657. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04796-5. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Microbial Communities across Global Marine Basins Show Important Compositional Similarities by Depth.全球海洋盆地的微生物群落按深度显示出重要的组成相似性。
mBio. 2020 Aug 18;11(4):e01448-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01448-20.
7
Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss.生态系统衰退随着栖息地丧失加剧了生物多样性丧失。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):238-243. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2531-2. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Drivers of beta diversity in modern and ancient reef-associated soft-bottom environments.现代和古代与珊瑚礁相关的软底环境中β多样性的驱动因素。
PeerJ. 2020 May 14;8:e9139. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9139. eCollection 2020.