Bird Charles P
a The Ohio State University , USA.
J Gen Psychol. 1978 Apr;98(2):197-205. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1978.9920873.
Two experiments were conducted with male and female university students in an attempt to establish whether syntactically ambiguous words are better represented by independent lexical entries for each syntactic context in which the items occur, or whether the different usages could be adequately represented by single entries. Both experiments were attempts to influence recall through control of the coding of ambiguous items. Experiment one (N = 128) involved a free recall procedure in which ambiguous items were embedded in lists of nonambiguous nouns or verbs, and Experiment two (N = 144) involved a release from proactive inhibition procedure which has been shown to make syntactic features highly salient. The results of both experiments supported the single entry view; that is, the ambiguous items apparently were not coded according to one usage independent of other usages.
对男女大学生进行了两项实验,旨在确定句法上有歧义的词是在其出现的每个句法语境中由独立的词汇项更好地表示,还是不同的用法可以由单个词条充分表示。两项实验都试图通过控制歧义项的编码来影响记忆。实验一(N = 128)采用自由回忆程序,其中歧义项嵌入在无歧义名词或动词列表中,实验二(N = 144)采用解除前摄抑制程序,该程序已被证明能使句法特征高度突出。两项实验的结果都支持单个词条观点;也就是说,歧义项显然不是根据一种独立于其他用法的用法进行编码的。