Girard Olivier, Brocherie Franck, Morin Jean-Benoit, Racinais Sébastien, Millet Grégoire P, Périard Julien D
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre, Doha, Qatar.
ISSUL, Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):e0170679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170679. eCollection 2017.
Examine the mechanical alterations associated with repeated treadmill sprinting performed in HOT (38°C) and CON (25°C) conditions.
Eleven recreationally active males performed a 30-min warm-up followed by three sets of five 5-s sprints with 25-s recovery and 3-min between sets in each environment. Constant-velocity running for 1-min at 10 and 20 km.h-1 was also performed prior to and following sprinting.
Mean skin (37.2±0.7 vs. 32.7±0.8°C; P<0.001) and core (38.9±0.2 vs. 38.8±0.3°C; P<0.05) temperatures, together with thermal comfort (P<0.001) were higher following repeated sprinting in HOT vs. CON. Step frequency and vertical stiffness were lower (-2.6±1.6% and -5.5±5.5%; both P<0.001) and contact time (+3.2±2.4%; P<0.01) higher in HOT for the mean of sets 1-3 compared to CON. Running distance per sprint decreased from set 1 to 3 (-7.0±6.4%; P<0.001), with a tendency for shorter distance covered in HOT vs. CON (-2.7±3.4%; P = 0.06). Mean vertical (-2.6±5.5%; P<0.01), horizontal (-9.1±4.4%; P<0.001) and resultant ground reaction forces (-3.0±2.8%; P<0.01) along with vertical stiffness (-12.9±2.3%; P<0.001) and leg stiffness (-8.4±2.7%; P<0.01) decreased from set 1 to 3, independently of conditions. Propulsive power decreased from set 1 to 3 (-16.9±2.4%; P<0.001), with lower propulsive power values in set 2 (-6.6%; P<0.05) in HOT vs. CON. No changes in constant-velocity running patterns occurred between conditions, or from pre-to-post repeated-sprint exercise.
Thermal strain alters step frequency and vertical stiffness during repeated sprinting; however without exacerbating mechanical alterations. The absence of changes in constant-velocity running patterns suggests a strong link between fatigue-induced velocity decrements during sprinting and mechanical alterations.
研究在热环境(38°C)和常温环境(25°C)下进行重复跑步机冲刺跑所伴随的力学改变。
11名有运动习惯的男性先进行30分钟热身,然后在每个环境中进行三组,每组五次5秒的冲刺跑,每次冲刺跑后有25秒恢复时间,组间休息3分钟。在冲刺跑前后还分别以10和20 km·h-1的速度进行1分钟的匀速跑步。
与常温环境相比,在热环境下重复冲刺跑后,平均皮肤温度(37.2±0.7 vs. 32.7±0.8°C;P<0.001)和核心温度(38.9±0.2 vs. 38.8±0.3°C;P<0.05)以及热舒适度(P<0.001)均更高。与常温环境相比,热环境下第1 - 3组的平均步频和垂直刚度较低(分别降低-2.6±1.6%和-5.5±5.5%;P均<0.001),而接触时间更长(增加+3.2±2.4%;P<0.01)。每次冲刺跑的距离从第1组到第3组减少(-7.0±6.4%;P<0.001),且热环境下的冲刺跑距离有短于常温环境的趋势(-2.7±3.4%;P = 0.06)。从第1组到第3组,平均垂直力(-2.6±5.5%;P<0.01)、水平力(-9.1±4.4%;P<0.001)和合成地面反作用力(-3.0±2.8%;P<0.01)以及垂直刚度(-12.9±2.3%;P<0.001)和腿部刚度(-8.4±2.7%;P<0.01)均下降,且不受环境条件影响。推进功率从第1组到第3组下降(-16.9±2.4%;P<0.001),热环境下第2组的推进功率值低于常温环境(-6.6%;P<0.05)。不同环境条件之间以及重复冲刺跑前后的匀速跑步模式均未发生变化。
热应激会改变重复冲刺跑过程中的步频和垂直刚度;然而并不会加剧力学改变。匀速跑步模式未发生变化表明冲刺跑过程中疲劳导致的速度下降与力学改变之间存在紧密联系。