• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical predictors of abnormal head computed tomography scan in patients who are conscious after head injury.头部受伤后仍有意识患者头颅计算机断层扫描异常的临床预测因素
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):64-67. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.193538.
2
Correlation of clinical features with neuroimaging in children with mild head injury.轻度头部损伤儿童临床特征与神经影像学的相关性
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):650-654. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_246_2023. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
3
Can an abnormal CT scan be predicted from common symptoms after mild head injury in children?儿童轻度头部损伤后能否根据常见症状预测CT扫描异常?
J Pediatr Neurosci. 2013 Sep;8(3):183-7. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.123659.
4
Role of repeat CT in mild to moderate head injury: an institutional study.重复 CT 在轻度至中度头部损伤中的作用:一项机构研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19527.
5
Clinical decision instruments for CT scan in minor head trauma.轻度头部创伤中CT扫描的临床决策工具
J Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;34(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.05.055. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
6
Mild head injury: revisited.轻度头部损伤:再探讨
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Oct;146(10):1075-82; discussion 1082-3. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0335-z.
7
Indications for brain CT scan in patients with minor head injury.轻度头部损伤患者进行脑部CT扫描的指征。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007 Jun;109(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.01.013. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
8
Indications for brain computed tomography scan after minor head injury.轻度头部损伤后脑部计算机断层扫描的适应症。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Oct;4(4):472-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.86631.
9
Will Neuroimaging Reveal a Severe Intracranial Injury in This Adult With Minor Head Trauma?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.神经影像学能否发现轻度头部外伤的成人严重颅内损伤?:合理临床检查系统评价。
JAMA. 2015;314(24):2672-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16316.
10
Do children with blunt head trauma and normal cranial computed tomography scan results require hospitalization for neurologic observation?患有钝器性头部外伤且头颅计算机断层扫描结果正常的儿童是否需要住院进行神经观察?
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;58(4):315-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.060. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Peri-injury symptomatology as predictors of brain computed tomography (CT) scan abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).创伤后症状作为轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者脑部计算机断层扫描(CT)异常的预测指标
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 5;17(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00754-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical use of the Glasgow Coma Scale; a comprehensive narrative review of GCS methodology.格拉斯哥昏迷量表的实际应用;对格拉斯哥昏迷量表方法的全面叙述性综述
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2012 Aug;15(3):170-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
2
Mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Feb;19(2):191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03581.x.
3
Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.成人和儿童轻微头部损伤的诊断管理策略:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(27):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15270.
4
Minor head injury: CT-based strategies for management--a cost-effectiveness analysis.轻微头部损伤:基于 CT 的管理策略——成本效益分析。
Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):532-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2541081672.
5
Mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Apr;76(2):129-37. doi: 10.1002/msj.20101.
6
Minor head injury: guidelines for the use of CT--a multicenter validation study.轻度头部损伤:CT 使用指南——一项多中心验证研究
Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):831-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061509. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
7
Indications for brain CT scan in patients with minor head injury.轻度头部损伤患者进行脑部CT扫描的指征。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007 Jun;109(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.01.013. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
8
Indications for CT scanning in mild traumatic brain injury: A cost-effectiveness study.轻度创伤性脑损伤的CT扫描指征:一项成本效益研究。
J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):558-66. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000233766.60315.5e.
9
External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury.加拿大头颅CT检查规则和新奥尔良标准在轻度头部损伤患者CT扫描中的外部验证。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 28;294(12):1519-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1519.
10
Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury.加拿大头颅CT检查规则与新奥尔良标准在轻度头部损伤患者中的比较。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 28;294(12):1511-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1511.

头部受伤后仍有意识患者头颅计算机断层扫描异常的临床预测因素

Clinical predictors of abnormal head computed tomography scan in patients who are conscious after head injury.

作者信息

Mishra Rakesh Kumar, Munivenkatappa Ashok, Prathyusha Vasuki, Shukla Dhaval P, Devi Bhagavatula Indira

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):64-67. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.193538.

DOI:10.4103/0976-3147.193538
PMID:28149084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5225725/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Indication of a head computed tomography (CT) scan in a patient who remains conscious after head injury is controversial. We aimed to determine the clinical features that are most likely to be associated with abnormal CT scan in patients with a history of head injury, and who are conscious at the time of presentation to casualty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective observation study of patients presented to casualty with history of head injury, and who were conscious, i.e., Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15 at the time of evaluation. All patients underwent head CT scan. The CT scan was reported as abnormal if it showed any pathology ascribed to trauma. The following variables were used: age, gender, mode of injury (road traffic accident, fall, assault, and others), duration since injury, and history of transient loss of consciousness, headache, vomiting, ear/nose bleeding, and seizures. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the clinical features that predicted an abnormal CT scan.

RESULTS

During the observation period, a total of 1629 patients with head injury were evaluated, out of which 453 were in GCS 15. Abnormal CT scan was present in 195 (43%) patients. Among all the variables, the following were found significantly associated with abnormal CT scan: duration since injury (>12 h) < 0.001; vomiting odds, ratio (OR) 1.89 (1.23, 2.80), < 0.001; and presence of any symptom, OR 2.36 (1.52, 3.71), < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

A patient with GCS 15 presenting after 12 hours of injury with vomiting or combination of symptoms has a significant risk of abnormal head CT scan.

摘要

背景

对于头部受伤后仍保持清醒的患者,是否进行头部计算机断层扫描(CT)存在争议。我们旨在确定在有头部受伤史且就诊时清醒的患者中,最有可能与CT扫描异常相关的临床特征。

材料与方法

这是一项对有头部受伤史且就诊时清醒(即评估时格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分为15分)的患者进行的前瞻性观察研究。所有患者均接受头部CT扫描。如果CT扫描显示任何与创伤相关的病变,则报告为异常。使用了以下变量:年龄、性别、受伤方式(道路交通事故、跌倒、袭击及其他)、受伤后时长、短暂意识丧失史、头痛、呕吐、耳/鼻出血及癫痫发作史。采用逻辑回归分析来确定预测CT扫描异常的临床特征。

结果

在观察期内,共评估了1629例头部受伤患者,其中453例GCS评分为15分。195例(43%)患者CT扫描异常。在所有变量中,发现以下因素与CT扫描异常显著相关:受伤后时长(>12小时)<0.001;呕吐比值比(OR)为1.89(1.23,2.80),<0.001;存在任何症状,OR为2.36(1.52,3.71),<0.001。

结论

受伤12小时后出现呕吐或有多种症状的GCS评分为15分的患者,头部CT扫描异常的风险显著。