Rossberg Axel G, Uusitalo Laura, Berg Torsten, Zaiko Anastasija, Chenuil Anne, Uyarra María C, Borja Angel, Lynam Christopher P
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, UK and School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 327 Mile End Rd, London E1, UK.
Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE). Mechelininkatu 34a, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland.
Ecol Indic. 2017 Jan;72:215-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.005.
Wide-ranging, indicator-based assessments of large, complex ecosystems are playing an increasing role in guiding environmental policy and management. An example is the EU's Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which requires Member States to take measures to reach "good environmental status" (GES) in European marine waters. However, formulation of indicator targets consistent with the Directive's high-level policy goal of sustainable use has proven challenging. We develop a specific, quantitative interpretation of the concepts of GES and sustainable use in terms of indicators and associated targets, by sharply distinguishing between current uses to satisfy current societal needs and preferences, and unknown future uses. We argue that consistent targets to safeguard future uses derive from a requirement that any environmental state indicator should recover within a defined time (e.g. 30 years) to its pressure-free range of variation when all pressures are hypothetically removed. Within these constraints, specific targets for current uses should be set. Routes to implementation of this proposal for indicators of fish-community size structure, population size of selected species, eutrophication, impacts of non-indigenous species, and genetic diversity are discussed. Important policy implications are that (a) indicator target ranges, which may be wider than natural ranges, systematically and rationally derive from our proposal; (b) because relevant state indicators tend to respond slowly, corresponding pressures should also be monitored and assessed;
对大型复杂生态系统进行广泛的、基于指标的评估在指导环境政策和管理方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。一个例子是欧盟的《海洋战略框架指令》,该指令要求成员国采取措施,使欧洲海域达到“良好环境状态”(GES)。然而,制定与该指令可持续利用的高层次政策目标相一致的指标目标已被证明具有挑战性。我们通过明确区分满足当前社会需求和偏好的当前用途与未知的未来用途,从指标和相关目标的角度对GES和可持续利用的概念进行了具体的定量解释。我们认为,保障未来用途的一致目标源自一项要求,即当所有压力被假设消除时,任何环境状态指标应在规定时间内(例如30年)恢复到其无压力变化范围。在这些限制范围内,应为当前用途设定具体目标。本文讨论了针对鱼类群落大小结构、选定物种的种群大小、富营养化、非本地物种的影响以及遗传多样性等指标实施该提议的途径。重要的政策含义是:(a)指标目标范围可能比自然范围更宽,是从我们的提议中系统且合理推导出来的;(b)由于相关状态指标往往反应缓慢,相应的压力也应进行监测和评估;