Zilahi Gabor, McMahon Mary Aisling, Povoa Pedro, Martin-Loeches Ignacio
Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St James's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal;; NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Dec;8(12):3774-3780. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.89.
There are certain well defined clinical situations where prolonged therapy is beneficial, but prolonged duration of antibiotic therapy is associated with increased resistance, medicalising effects, high costs and adverse drug reactions. The best way to decrease antibiotic duration is both to stop antibiotics when not needed (sterile invasive cultures with clinical improvement), not to start antibiotics when not indicated (treating colonization) and keep the antibiotic course as short as possible. The optimal duration of antimicrobial treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is unknown, however, there is a growing evidence that reduction in the length of antibiotic courses to 7-8 days can minimize the consequences of antibiotic overuse in critical care, including antibiotic resistance, adverse effects, collateral damage and costs. Biomarkers like C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) do have a valuable role in helping guide antibiotic duration but should be interpreted cautiously in the context of the clinical situation. On the other hand, microbiological criteria alone are not reliable and should not be used to justify a prolonged antibiotic course, as clinical cure does not equate to microbiological eradication. We do not recommend a 'one size fits all' approach and in some clinical situations, including infection with non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB) clinical evaluation is needed but shortening the antibiotic course is an effective and safe way to decrease inappropriate antibiotic exposure.
在某些明确界定的临床情况下,延长治疗是有益的,但抗生素治疗时间延长与耐药性增加、医源性效应、高成本及药物不良反应相关。缩短抗生素治疗时间的最佳方法包括在不需要时停用抗生素(无菌侵入性培养且临床症状改善)、在无指征时不开始使用抗生素(治疗定植)并尽可能缩短抗生素疗程。呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的最佳抗菌治疗时长尚不清楚,然而,越来越多的证据表明,将抗生素疗程缩短至7 - 8天可将重症监护中抗生素过度使用的后果降至最低,包括抗生素耐药性、不良反应、间接损害和成本。像C反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)这样的生物标志物在帮助指导抗生素疗程方面确实具有重要作用,但应结合临床情况谨慎解读。另一方面,仅微生物学标准不可靠,不应将其作为延长抗生素疗程的理由,因为临床治愈并不等同于微生物学根除。我们不推荐“一刀切”的方法,在某些临床情况下,包括非发酵革兰阴性杆菌(NF - GNB)感染,需要进行临床评估,但缩短抗生素疗程是减少不适当抗生素暴露的有效且安全的方法。