T Thomas Hannah Mary, Devakumar Devadhas, Sasidharan Balukrishna, Bowen Stephen R, Heck Danie Kingslin, James Jebaseelan Samuel E
VIT University , School of Advanced Sciences, Department of Physics, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India.
Christian Medical College , Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jan;4(1):011009. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.011009. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
This paper presents an improved GrowCut (IGC), a positron emission tomography-based segmentation algorithm, and tests its clinical applicability. Contrary to the traditional method that requires the user to provide the initial seeds, the IGC algorithm starts with a threshold-based estimate of the tumor and a three-dimensional morphologically grown shell around the tumor as the foreground and background seeds, respectively. The repeatability of IGC from the same observer at multiple time points was compared with the traditional GrowCut algorithm. The algorithm was tested in 11 nonsmall cell lung cancer lesions and validated against the clinician-defined manual contour and compared against the clinically used 25% of the maximum standardized uptake value [SUV-(max)], 40% [Formula: see text], and adaptive threshold methods. The time to edit IGC-defined functional volume to arrive at the gross tumor volume (GTV) was compared with that of manual contouring. The repeatability of the IGC algorithm was very high compared with the traditional GrowCut ([Formula: see text]) and demonstrated higher agreement with the manual contour with respect to threshold-based methods. Compared with manual contouring, editing the IGC achieved the GTV in significantly less time ([Formula: see text]). The IGC algorithm offers a highly repeatable functional volume and serves as an effective initial guess that can well minimize the time spent on labor-intensive manual contouring.
本文提出了一种改进的生长切割算法(IGC),这是一种基于正电子发射断层扫描的分割算法,并测试了其临床适用性。与传统方法需要用户提供初始种子不同,IGC算法以基于阈值的肿瘤估计以及肿瘤周围三维形态学生长的外壳分别作为前景和背景种子开始。将同一观察者在多个时间点的IGC重复性与传统生长切割算法进行了比较。该算法在11个非小细胞肺癌病变中进行了测试,并与临床医生定义的手动轮廓进行了验证,还与临床使用的最大标准化摄取值的25%[SUV-(max)]、40%[公式:见正文]和自适应阈值方法进行了比较。将编辑IGC定义的功能体积以得到大体肿瘤体积(GTV)的时间与手动勾勒轮廓的时间进行了比较。与传统生长切割算法相比,IGC算法的重复性非常高([公式:见正文]),并且在基于阈值的方法方面与手动轮廓显示出更高的一致性。与手动勾勒轮廓相比,编辑IGC在显著更短的时间内实现了GTV([公式:见正文])。IGC算法提供了高度可重复的功能体积,并作为一种有效的初始猜测,能够很好地减少在劳动密集型手动轮廓勾勒上花费的时间。