• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用综合决策支持系统(IDSS)对埃塞俄比亚的新型农业技术进行评估。

Evaluation of new farming technologies in Ethiopia using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS).

作者信息

Clarke Neville, Bizimana Jean-Claude, Dile Yihun, Worqlul Abeyou, Osorio Javier, Herbst Brian, Richardson James W, Srinivasan Raghavan, Gerik Thomas J, Williams Jimmy, Jones Charles A, Jeong Jaehak

机构信息

The Norman Borlaug Institute for International Agriculture, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, United States.

Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

出版信息

Agric Water Manag. 2017 Jan 31;180(Pt B):267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.023
PMID:28154450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5221669/
Abstract

This study investigates multi-dimensional impacts of adopting new technology in agriculture at the farm/village and watershed scale in sub-Saharan Africa using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS). Application of IDSS as an integrated modeling tool helps solve complex issues in agricultural systems by simultaneously assessing production, environmental, economic, and nutritional consequences of adopting agricultural technologies for sustainable increases in food production and use of scarce natural resources. The IDSS approach was applied to the Amhara region of Ethiopia, where the scarcity of resources and agro-environmental consequences are critical to agricultural productivity of small farm, to analyze the impacts of alternative agricultural technology interventions. Results show significant improvements in family income and nutrition, achieved through the adoption of irrigation technologies, proper use of fertilizer, and improved seed varieties while preserving environmental indicators in terms of soil erosion and sediment loadings. These pilot studies demonstrate the usefulness of the IDSS approach as a tool that can be used to predict and evaluate the economic and environmental consequences of adopting new agricultural technologies that aim to improve the livelihoods of subsistence farmers.

摘要

本研究使用综合决策支持系统(IDSS),在撒哈拉以南非洲的农场/村庄和流域尺度上,调查采用农业新技术的多维度影响。将IDSS作为一种综合建模工具加以应用,通过同时评估采用农业技术对粮食产量可持续增长和稀缺自然资源利用的生产、环境、经济和营养后果,有助于解决农业系统中的复杂问题。IDSS方法应用于埃塞俄比亚的阿姆哈拉地区,那里资源稀缺和农业环境后果对小农场的农业生产力至关重要,以分析替代性农业技术干预措施的影响。结果表明,通过采用灌溉技术、合理使用化肥和改良种子品种,在保持土壤侵蚀和沉积物负荷等环境指标的同时,可以显著提高家庭收入和营养水平。这些试点研究证明了IDSS方法作为一种工具的有用性,该工具可用于预测和评估采用旨在改善自给农民生计的新型农业技术的经济和环境后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a656/5221669/6f7fa6d71d99/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a656/5221669/50eb8d766e6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a656/5221669/6f7fa6d71d99/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a656/5221669/50eb8d766e6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a656/5221669/6f7fa6d71d99/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of new farming technologies in Ethiopia using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS).使用综合决策支持系统(IDSS)对埃塞俄比亚的新型农业技术进行评估。
Agric Water Manag. 2017 Jan 31;180(Pt B):267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.023.
2
Integrated Decision Support Systems (IDSS) for Dairy Farming: A Discussion on How to Improve Their Sustained Adoption.奶牛养殖综合决策支持系统(IDSS):关于如何提高其持续采用率的探讨
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 7;11(7):2025. doi: 10.3390/ani11072025.
3
Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France).支持农药行动计划的农业情景综合建模(IMAS):以库隆格饮用水集水区(法国西南部)为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Mar;24(8):6923-6950. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7657-2. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Adapting the current mass mobilization approach in Ethiopia to enhance its impact on sustainable land management: Lessons from the Sago-kara watershed.将埃塞俄比亚当前的大规模动员方法加以调整,以增强其对可持续土地管理的影响:来自萨戈-卡拉流域的经验教训。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109336. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109336. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
5
Evaluating satellite-based evapotranspiration estimates for hydrological applications in data-scarce regions: A case in Ethiopia.评估基于卫星的蒸散估算在数据稀缺地区的水文应用:以埃塞俄比亚为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 15;743:140702. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140702. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
The Adoption of Bundled Sustainable Farm and Environmental Practices by Coffee Farmers in Southwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部咖啡种植户对捆绑式可持续农场和环境实践的采用。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Dec 8;2021:9954230. doi: 10.1155/2021/9954230. eCollection 2021.
7
Sustainability assessment of greenhouse vegetable farming practices from environmental, economic, and socio-institutional perspectives in China.从环境、经济和社会制度视角对中国温室蔬菜种植实践的可持续性评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Sep;23(17):17287-97. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6937-1. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Sustainability of farmers' soil fertility management practices: a case study in the North China Plain.农民土壤肥力管理实践的可持续性:以华北平原为例
J Environ Manage. 2006 Jun;79(4):409-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.009. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
9
Improved feeding and forages at a crossroads: Farming systems approaches for sustainable livestock development in East Africa.十字路口的改良饲料与草料:东非可持续畜牧业发展的养殖系统方法
Outlook Agric. 2020 Mar;49(1):13-20. doi: 10.1177/0030727020906170. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
10
Livelihoods, Technological Constraints, and Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Preferences of Farmers: Analytical Frameworks of Technology Adoption and Farmer Livelihoods.农民的生计、技术约束与低碳农业技术偏好:技术采纳与农民生计的分析框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413364.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-criteria suitability analysis for neglected and underutilised crop species in South Africa.南非被忽视和利用不足作物的多准则适宜性分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0244734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244734. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables.基于 Boosting 的五种模型用于估算有限气象变量下的日参考蒸散量的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 29;15(6):e0235324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235324. eCollection 2020.
3
Leveraging LoRaWAN Technology for Precision Agriculture in Greenhouses.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the implications of water harvesting intensification on upstream-downstream ecosystem services: A case study in the Lake Tana basin.评估集水强化对上下游生态系统服务的影响:以塔纳湖流域为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;542(Pt A):22-35. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.065. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
2
Sensitivity Analysis of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) for Phosphorus Loads in Tile-Drained Landscapes.农业政策/环境扩展模型(APEX)对瓦管排水景观中磷负荷的敏感性分析
J Environ Qual. 2015 Jul;44(4):1099-110. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.12.0527.
3
Hydrological response to climate change for Gilgel Abay River, in the Lake Tana Basin -Upper Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia.
利用 LoRaWAN 技术实现温室中的精准农业。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 25;20(7):1827. doi: 10.3390/s20071827.
埃塞俄比亚塔纳湖流域-青尼罗河上游流域吉尔嘎尔阿巴伊河对气候变化的水文响应。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 24;8(10):e79296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079296. eCollection 2013.
4
A conceptual framework for the economic analysis of factors influencing decision-making of small-scale farmers in animal health management.影响小规模农户动物健康管理决策因素的经济分析概念框架。
Rev Sci Tech. 2001 Dec;20(3):687-700. doi: 10.20506/rst.20.3.1302.
5
A bountiful harvest of rainwater.雨水充沛。
Science. 2001 Sep 7;293(5536):1763. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5536.1763b.