Korematsu Seigo, Fujitaka Michiko, Ogata Mika, Zaitsu Masafumi, Motomura Chikako, Kuzume Kazuyo, Toku Yuchiro, Ikeda Masanori, Odajima Hiroshi
West Japan Research Society Pediatric Clinical Allergy, Fukuoka 811-1394, Japan.; Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita 879-5593, Japan.
West Japan Research Society Pediatric Clinical Allergy, Fukuoka 811-1394, Japan.
Asia Pac Allergy. 2017 Jan;7(1):37-41. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2017.7.1.37. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
In view of the increasing prevalence of food allergies, there has been an associated increase in frequency of situations requiring an emergency response for anaphylaxis at the home, childcare facilities and educational institutions.
To clarify the situation of adrenaline auto-injector administration in nursery/kindergarten/school, we carried out a questionnaire survey on pediatric physicians in Western Japan.
In 2015, self-reported questionnaires were mailed to 421 physicians who are members of the West Japan Research Society Pediatric Clinical Allergy and Shikoku Research Society Pediatric Clinical Allergy.
The response rate was 44% (185 physicians) where 160 physicians had a prescription registration for the adrenaline auto-injector. In the past year, 1,330 patients were prescribed the adrenaline auto-injector where 83 patients (6% of the prescribed patients) actually administered the adrenaline auto-injector, of which 14 patients (17% of the administered patients) self-administered the adrenaline auto-injector. "Guardians" at the nursery/kindergarten and elementary school were found to have administered the adrenaline auto-injector the most. Among 117 adrenaline auto-injector prescription-registered physicians, 79% had experienced nonadministration of adrenaline auto-injector at nursery/kindergarten/school when anaphylaxis has occurred. The most frequent reason cited for not administering the adrenaline auto-injector was "hesitation about the timing of administration."
If the adrenaline auto-injector was administered after the guardian arrived at the nursery/kindergarten/school, it may lead to delayed treatment of anaphylaxis in which symptoms develop in minutes. Education and cooperation among physicians and nursery/kindergarten/school staff will reduce the number of children suffering unfortunate outcomes due to anaphylaxis.
鉴于食物过敏的患病率不断上升,在家中、儿童保育设施和教育机构中,需要对过敏反应进行应急处理的情况也相应增加。
为了阐明在托儿所/幼儿园/学校使用肾上腺素自动注射器的情况,我们对日本西部的儿科医生进行了问卷调查。
2015年,我们向日本西部研究协会儿科临床过敏分会和四国研究协会儿科临床过敏分会的421名医生邮寄了自填式问卷。
回复率为44%(185名医生),其中160名医生有肾上腺素自动注射器的处方登记。在过去一年中,有1330名患者被开了肾上腺素自动注射器,其中83名患者(占开处方患者的6%)实际使用了肾上腺素自动注射器,其中14名患者(占使用患者的17%)自行使用了肾上腺素自动注射器。托儿所/幼儿园和小学的“监护人”使用肾上腺素自动注射器的情况最为常见。在117名有肾上腺素自动注射器处方登记的医生中,79%的人曾经历过在托儿所/幼儿园/学校发生过敏反应时未使用肾上腺素自动注射器的情况。未使用肾上腺素自动注射器最常见的原因是“对给药时机犹豫不决”。
如果在监护人到达托儿所/幼儿园/学校后才使用肾上腺素自动注射器,可能会导致过敏反应的治疗延迟,而过敏反应的症状会在几分钟内出现。医生与托儿所/幼儿园/学校工作人员之间的教育与合作将减少因过敏反应而遭受不幸后果的儿童数量。