Norman M B, Sullivan C E
David Read Laboratory, University of Sydney, Room 450 Blackburn Building D06, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Sleep Breath. 2017 Sep;21(3):657-666. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1468-7. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
The purpose of this study was to use non-EEG PSG signals to estimate TST in order to diagnose SDB with a greater sensitivity than type 3 device methodology that relies on TRT.
Movement patterns were obtained from the thoracoabdominal signals of adult PSG recordings (n = 60) in the laboratory and the home. Parameters obtained allowed, with 95% certainty, identification of sleep and wake based on the duration of movements and quiescent time (Qd). Snoring, apneas, and hypopneas indicated sleep with 100% certainty. The method was tested in a different set of PSG recordings (n = 80).
Subjects lay awake and immobile for longer in the laboratory (Qd = 27.4 (12.1, 62.0), Qd = 16.0 s (8.0, 36.0); p < 0.0001) but asleep and immobile for longer at home (Qd = 65.2 (23.0, 121.4), Qd = 95.0 s (44.5, 247.5); 0.005). Only 5% of wake Qd periods were >173 s in the laboratory and >105 s at home. In both locations, 95% of movements during sleep were <10 s. Experimental TST values were 21 min shorter than EEG-defined TST and, combined with fewer scored respiratory events, produced AHI values that were 1.6 events/h lower than the reference. The experimental TST increased the sensitivity of SDB diagnosis from 73 to 97%.
In the sleep laboratory, subjects are immobile for longer periods when awake and for shorter periods when asleep. The experimental TST was similar to EEG-defined TST and could be used to diagnose SDB with a much higher sensitivity than the type 3 method.
本研究旨在使用非脑电图多导睡眠图(PSG)信号来估计总睡眠时间(TST),以便比依赖于睡眠时间记录(TRT)的3型设备方法更灵敏地诊断睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)。
在实验室和家中,从成人PSG记录(n = 60)的胸腹信号中获取运动模式。根据运动持续时间和静息时间(Qd),所获得的参数能以95%的确定性识别睡眠和清醒状态。打鼾、呼吸暂停和呼吸不足则可100%确定为睡眠状态。该方法在另一组PSG记录(n = 80)中进行了测试。
受试者在实验室中清醒且静止不动的时间更长(Qd = 27.4(12.1,62.0),Qd = 16.0秒(8.0,36.0);p < 0.0001),但在家中睡眠且静止不动的时间更长(Qd = 65.2(23.0,121.4),Qd = 95.0秒(44.5,247.5);0.005)。在实验室中,只有5%的清醒Qd时段超过173秒,在家中则超过1条5秒。在两个地点,睡眠期间95%的运动时间均小于10秒。实验性TST值比脑电图定义的TST短21分钟,并且结合较少的计分呼吸事件,得出的睡眠呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)值比参考值低1.6次/小时。实验性TST将SDB诊断的敏感性从73%提高到了97%。
在睡眠实验室中,受试者清醒时静止不动的时间更长,而睡眠时静止不动的时间更短。实验性TST与脑电图定义的TST相似,并且可用于以比3型方法高得多的敏感性来诊断SDB。