Suppr超能文献

荷兰模态排他性规范:在空间中模拟感知模态。

Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space.

机构信息

Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Erasmusplein 1, Nijmegen, 6500 HD, The Netherlands.

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 6500 AH, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2204-2218. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3.

Abstract

Perceptual information is important for the meaning of nouns. We present modality exclusivity norms for 485 Dutch nouns rated on visual, auditory, haptic, gustatory, and olfactory associations. We found these nouns are highly multimodal. They were rated most dominant in vision, and least in olfaction. A factor analysis identified two main dimensions: one loaded strongly on olfaction and gustation (reflecting joint involvement in flavor), and a second loaded strongly on vision and touch (reflecting joint involvement in manipulable objects). In a second study, we validated the ratings with similarity judgments. As expected, words from the same dominant modality were rated more similar than words from different dominant modalities; but - more importantly - this effect was enhanced when word pairs had high modality strength ratings. We further demonstrated the utility of our ratings by investigating whether perceptual modalities are differentially experienced in space, in a third study. Nouns were categorized into their dominant modality and used in a lexical decision experiment where the spatial position of words was either in proximal or distal space. We found words dominant in olfaction were processed faster in proximal than distal space compared to the other modalities, suggesting olfactory information is mentally simulated as "close" to the body. Finally, we collected ratings of emotion (valence, dominance, and arousal) to assess its role in perceptual space simulation, but the valence did not explain the data. So, words are processed differently depending on their perceptual associations, and strength of association is captured by modality exclusivity ratings.

摘要

感知信息对于名词的意义很重要。我们呈现了 485 个荷兰名词的模态排他性规范,这些名词的视觉、听觉、触觉、味觉和嗅觉联想进行了评估。我们发现这些名词具有高度的多模态性。它们在视觉上的评价最高,在嗅觉上的评价最低。一项因素分析确定了两个主要维度:一个强烈地加载在嗅觉和味觉上(反映了在味道方面的联合参与),另一个强烈地加载在视觉和触觉上(反映了在可操纵物体方面的联合参与)。在第二项研究中,我们通过相似性判断验证了这些评价。正如预期的那样,来自相同主导模态的单词比来自不同主导模态的单词评价更相似;但更重要的是,当单词对具有高模态强度评价时,这种效应会增强。我们通过在第三项研究中调查感知模态是否在空间中不同地被体验,进一步证明了我们的评价的效用。名词被归类为主导模态,并在词汇决策实验中使用,其中单词的空间位置要么在近端空间,要么在远端空间。我们发现,与其他模态相比,嗅觉主导的单词在近端空间的处理速度比在远端空间快,这表明嗅觉信息被心理模拟为“接近”身体。最后,我们收集了情绪(愉悦度、支配度和唤醒度)的评价,以评估其在感知空间模拟中的作用,但愉悦度并不能解释数据。因此,单词的处理方式取决于它们的感知联想,而联想的强度则由模态排他性评价来捕捉。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验