Liao Sam, Simpson Benjamin, Neidlin Michael, Kaufmann Tim A S, Li Zhiyong, Woodruff Maria A, Gregory Shaun D
Innovative Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Laboratory (ICETLAB), Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):136. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0262-2.
Implantation of a rotary blood pump (RBP) can cause non-physiological flow fields in the left ventricle (LV) which may trigger thrombosis. Different inflow cannula geometry can affect LV flow fields. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of inflow cannula geometry on intraventricular flow under full LV support in a patient specific model.
Computed tomography angiography imaging of the LV was performed on a RBP candidate to develop a patient-specific model. Five inflow cannulae were evaluated, which were modelled on those used clinically or under development. The inflow cannulae are described as a crown like tip, thin walled tubular tip, large filleted tip, trumpet like tip and an inferiorly flared cannula. Placement of the inflow cannula was at the LV apex with the central axis intersecting the centre of the mitral valve. Full support was simulated by prescribing 5 l/min across the mitral valve. Thrombus risk was evaluated by identifying regions of stagnation. Rate of LV washout was assessed using a volume of fluid model. Relative haemolysis index and blood residence time was calculated using an Eulerian approach.
The inferiorly flared inflow cannula had the lowest thrombus risk due to low stagnation volumes. All cannulae had similar rates of LV washout and blood residence time. The crown like tip and thin walled tubular tip resulted in relatively higher blood damage indices within the LV.
Changes in intraventricular flow due to variances in cannula geometry resulted in different stagnation volumes. Cannula geometry does not appreciably affect LV washout rates and blood residence time. The patient specific, full support computational fluid dynamic model provided a repeatable platform to investigate the effects of inflow cannula geometry on intraventricular flow.
植入旋转血泵(RBP)可在左心室(LV)中引起非生理性流场,这可能引发血栓形成。不同的流入插管几何形状会影响左心室流场。本研究的目的是在患者特异性模型中确定在左心室完全支持下流入插管几何形状对心室内血流的影响。
对一名RBP候选患者进行左心室计算机断层血管造影成像,以建立患者特异性模型。评估了五种流入插管,它们是根据临床使用或正在研发的插管进行建模的。这些流入插管被描述为冠状尖端、薄壁管状尖端、大圆角尖端、喇叭状尖端和向下扩张的插管。流入插管放置在左心室心尖处,中心轴与二尖瓣中心相交。通过设定二尖瓣处5升/分钟的流量来模拟完全支持。通过识别停滞区域来评估血栓风险。使用流体体积模型评估左心室冲洗率。使用欧拉方法计算相对溶血指数和血液停留时间。
向下扩张的流入插管由于停滞体积低而具有最低的血栓风险。所有插管的左心室冲洗率和血液停留时间相似。冠状尖端和薄壁管状尖端在左心室内导致相对较高的血液损伤指数。
插管几何形状的差异导致心室内血流变化,从而产生不同的停滞体积。插管几何形状对左心室冲洗率和血液停留时间没有明显影响。患者特异性的、完全支持的计算流体动力学模型提供了一个可重复的平台,用于研究流入插管几何形状对心室内血流的影响。