• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神障碍患者对独立住房的偏好:系统评价与荟萃分析

Preference for Independent Housing of Persons with Mental Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Richter Dirk, Hoffmann Holger

机构信息

Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, University Bern Psychiatric Services, Murtenstrasse 46, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.

School of Health Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Nov;44(6):817-823. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0791-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-017-0791-4
PMID:28160182
Abstract

Choice of housing has become an important political and therapeutic goal for psychiatric rehabilitation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions of studies on preference for independent housing. A subgroup analysis compared studies with homeless and non-homeless consumers. The meta-analysis included 8 studies with 3134 consumers. The overall proportion of consumers who had expressed a preference for living independently was 0.84. There were only marginal differences between studies with homeless and non-homeless consumers. In a given service planning area, the rate of independent housing settings should exceed the rate of more institutionalized settings by a wide margin.

摘要

住房选择已成为精神疾病康复的一项重要政治和治疗目标。我们对关于独立住房偏好的研究比例进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。一项亚组分析比较了无家可归者和非无家可归者的研究。荟萃分析纳入了8项研究,涉及3134名消费者。表示偏好独立生活的消费者总体比例为0.84。无家可归者和非无家可归者的研究之间只有微小差异。在给定的服务规划区域内,独立住房环境的比例应大幅超过机构化程度更高的环境的比例。

相似文献

1
Preference for Independent Housing of Persons with Mental Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.精神障碍患者对独立住房的偏好:系统评价与荟萃分析
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Nov;44(6):817-823. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0791-4.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Independent housing and support for people with severe mental illness: systematic review.独立住房和支持服务对严重精神疾病患者的效果:系统评价。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):269-279. doi: 10.1111/acps.12765. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.针对重度精神疾病成年人获得和维持就业的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
The physical and mental health effects of housing homeless people: A systematic review.将无家可归者安置住房对其身心健康的影响:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):448-468. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13486. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.冠心病管理中的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD008895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008895.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Outcomes of Supported Living for People with Severe Mental Illness: A One Year Evaluation of Floating Outreach in Germany.重度精神疾病患者支持性生活的社会心理结果:德国流动外展服务的一年评估
Community Ment Health J. 2025 May;61(4):754-763. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01400-5. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
2
Pathways to social integration among homeless-experienced adults with serious mental illness: a qualitative perspective.有严重精神疾病的流浪经历成年人实现社会融合的途径:定性视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11678-6.
3
Independent Supported Housing vs institutional housing rehabilitation settings for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness - longitudinal results from an observational study.
独立支持性住房与机构性住房康复环境对非无家可归的严重精神疾病个体的影响:一项观察性研究的纵向结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05995-7.
4
Placement into Scattered-Site or Place-Based Permanent Supportive Housing in Los Angeles County, CA, During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县的分散地点或基于地点的永久性支持性住房安置。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):805-817. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01359-1. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
5
Profiles of quality of life among patients using emergency departments for mental health reasons.因心理健康问题而使用急诊科的患者的生活质量概况。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Oct 26;21(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02200-3.
6
What are important ingredients for Intensive Home Support for people with severe mental illness according to experts? A concept mapping approach.根据专家的说法,对于患有严重精神疾病的人来说,强化家庭支持的重要因素是什么?一种概念映射方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04975-7.
7
Current insights of community mental healthcare for people with severe mental illness: A scoping review.严重精神疾病患者社区精神卫生保健的当前见解:一项范围综述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 18;14:1156235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1156235. eCollection 2023.
8
Investigating the Comparative Effectiveness of Place-Based and Scatter-Site Permanent Supportive Housing for People Experiencing Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocols for a Mixed Methods, Prospective Longitudinal Study.调查新冠疫情期间针对无家可归者的就地安置和分散安置永久性支持性住房的比较效果:一项混合方法前瞻性纵向研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 28;12:e46782. doi: 10.2196/46782.
9
Independent Supported Housing for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: Comparison of two effectiveness studies using a randomised controlled and an observational study design.为患有严重精神疾病的非无家可归者提供的独立支持性住房:两项有效性研究的比较,一项采用随机对照研究设计,另一项采用观察性研究设计。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 10;13:1033328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033328. eCollection 2022.
10
Independent Supported Housing Versus Institutionalised Residential Rehabilitation for Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Survey of Attitudes and Working Conditions Among Mental Healthcare Professionals.独立支持性住房与机构化住宅康复治疗对严重精神疾病患者的比较:精神卫生保健专业人员态度和工作条件调查。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Apr;59(3):531-539. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01037-2. Epub 2022 Oct 13.