van Dessel Lisanne F, Beije Nick, Helmijr Jean C A, Vitale Silvia R, Kraan Jaco, Look Maxime P, de Wit Ronald, Sleijfer Stefan, Jansen Maurice P H M, Martens John W M, Lolkema Martijn P
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Workgroup Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mol Oncol. 2017 Mar;11(3):295-304. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12037. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential new biomarker with diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic applications for various solid tumor types. Before beginning large prospective clinical trials to prove the added value of utilizing ctDNA in clinical practice, it is essential to investigate the effects of various preanalytical conditions on the quality of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in general and of ctDNA in particular in order to optimize and standardize these conditions. Whole blood samples were collected from patients with metastatic cancer bearing a known somatic variant. The following preanalytical conditions were investigated: (a) different time intervals to plasma isolation (1, 24, and 96 h) and (b) different preservatives in blood collection tubes (EDTA, CellSave, and BCT). The quality of cfDNA/ctDNA was assessed by DNA quantification, digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) for somatic variant detection and a β-actin fragmentation assay for DNA contamination from lysed leukocytes. In 11 (69%) of our 16 patients, we were able to detect the known somatic variant in ctDNA. We observed a time-dependent increase in cfDNA concentrations in EDTA tubes, which was positively correlated with an increase in wild-type copy numbers and large DNA fragments (> 420 bp). Using different preservatives did not affect somatic variant detection ability, but did stabilize cfDNA concentrations over time. Variant allele frequency was affected by fluctuations in cfDNA concentration only in EDTA tubes at 96 h. Both CellSave and BCT tubes ensured optimal ctDNA quality in plasma processed within 96 h after blood collection for downstream somatic variant detection by dPCR.
循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)已成为一种潜在的新型生物标志物,可用于多种实体瘤类型的诊断、预测和预后评估。在开展大型前瞻性临床试验以证明在临床实践中使用ctDNA的附加价值之前,有必要研究各种分析前条件对游离DNA(cfDNA)质量的影响,特别是对ctDNA质量的影响,以便优化和规范这些条件。从患有已知体细胞变异的转移性癌症患者中采集全血样本。研究了以下分析前条件:(a)血浆分离的不同时间间隔(1、24和96小时),以及(b)采血管中不同的防腐剂(乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、CellSave和BD Vacutainer® CPT™ 管(BCT))。通过DNA定量、用于体细胞变异检测的数字聚合酶链反应(dPCR)以及用于检测裂解白细胞DNA污染的β-肌动蛋白片段化分析来评估cfDNA/ctDNA的质量。在我们16例患者中的11例(69%)中,我们能够在ctDNA中检测到已知的体细胞变异。我们观察到EDTA管中cfDNA浓度随时间增加,这与野生型拷贝数和大DNA片段(>420 bp)的增加呈正相关。使用不同的防腐剂不会影响体细胞变异检测能力,但会随时间稳定cfDNA浓度。仅在96小时的EDTA管中,变异等位基因频率受cfDNA浓度波动的影响。CellSave管和BCT管均可确保在采血后96小时内处理的血浆中ctDNA质量最佳,以便通过dPCR进行下游体细胞变异检测。