Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, Sydney Local Health District & Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281819. eCollection 2023.
This systematic review aims to investigate, identify, and compare evidence related to the barriers, enablers, and strategies to embedding translational research within a public hospital system focussed on nursing and allied health disciplines.
A systematic review looking at the international literature on the barriers, enablers and strategies in embedding translational research within a public health system addressing nursing and allied health professions. The study channelled the PRISMA reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Databases searched were Medline, Embase, Scopus and Pubmed from January 2011 to December 2021 (inclusive). A quality assessment was conducted of literature using the mixed methods appraisal tool 2011 version.
Thirteen papers met the inclusion criteria. The studies included were from Australia, Saudi Arabia, China, Denmark and Canada. Occupational therapy and physiotherapy were the only two allied health disciplines identified in the search process. The review found considerable inter-relationships between the enablers, barriers, and strategies to embedding research translation in a public hospital setting. Three over-arching themes 'leadership, organisational culture and capabilities' were developed to capture the complexity of factors in embedding translational research. Key subthemes identified were education, knowledge, management, time, workplace culture and resources. All thirteen articles identified that a multifactorial approach is required to embed a research culture and translate research findings into clinical practice.
The themes of leadership, organisational culture and capabilities are inherently intertwined and therefore successful strategies require a whole of health approach with organisational leadership driving the strategy, as changing organisational culture takes time and considerable investment. We recommend that public health organisations, senior executives and policy makers consider the findings of this review to provide evidence to initiate organisational changes to support and help create a research environment to drive research translation within the public sector.
本系统评价旨在调查、识别和比较与将转化研究嵌入以护理和相关健康学科为重点的公立医院系统相关的障碍、促进因素和策略的证据。
系统评价着眼于国际文献,研究在关注护理和相关健康专业的公共卫生系统中嵌入转化研究的障碍、促进因素和策略。该研究遵循 PRISMA 系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南。搜索的数据库包括 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Pubmed,时间范围为 2011 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月(包括在内)。使用混合方法评估工具 2011 年版对文献进行质量评估。
符合纳入标准的有 13 篇论文。这些研究来自澳大利亚、沙特阿拉伯、中国、丹麦和加拿大。在搜索过程中,仅确定了职业治疗和物理治疗这两个相关健康学科。该评价发现,在将研究转化嵌入公立医院环境方面,促进因素、障碍和策略之间存在相当多的相互关系。为了捕捉嵌入转化研究的因素的复杂性,提出了三个总体主题“领导力、组织文化和能力”。确定的关键子主题包括教育、知识、管理、时间、工作场所文化和资源。所有 13 篇文章都认为,需要采取多因素方法来嵌入研究文化并将研究结果转化为临床实践。
领导力、组织文化和能力这三个主题是内在交织的,因此成功的策略需要采用整体健康方法,由组织领导推动策略,因为改变组织文化需要时间和大量投资。我们建议公共卫生组织、高级管理人员和政策制定者考虑本评价的结果,为启动组织变革提供证据,以支持和帮助在公共部门创建一个研究环境,推动研究转化。