Suppr超能文献

基于SEIPS的初级保健过程建模。

SEIPS-based process modeling in primary care.

作者信息

Wooldridge Abigail R, Carayon Pascale, Hundt Ann Schoofs, Hoonakker Peter L T

机构信息

Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2017 Apr;60:240-254. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

Abstract

Process mapping, often used as part of the human factors and systems engineering approach to improve care delivery and outcomes, should be expanded to represent the complex, interconnected sociotechnical aspects of health care. Here, we propose a new sociotechnical process modeling method to describe and evaluate processes, using the SEIPS model as the conceptual framework. The method produces a process map and supplementary table, which identify work system barriers and facilitators. In this paper, we present a case study applying this method to three primary care processes. We used purposeful sampling to select staff (care managers, providers, nurses, administrators and patient access representatives) from two clinics to observe and interview. We show the proposed method can be used to understand and analyze healthcare processes systematically and identify specific areas of improvement. Future work is needed to assess usability and usefulness of the SEIPS-based process modeling method and further refine it.

摘要

流程映射通常作为人因与系统工程方法的一部分,用于改善医疗服务提供和结果,应加以扩展以呈现医疗保健复杂的、相互关联的社会技术方面。在此,我们提出一种新的社会技术流程建模方法,以使用SEIPS模型作为概念框架来描述和评估流程。该方法生成一个流程地图和补充表格,可识别工作系统的障碍和促进因素。在本文中,我们展示了将此方法应用于三个初级保健流程的案例研究。我们采用目的抽样法从两家诊所选取工作人员(护理经理、提供者、护士、管理人员和患者接待代表)进行观察和访谈。我们表明所提出的方法可用于系统地理解和分析医疗保健流程,并识别具体的改进领域。未来需要开展工作来评估基于SEIPS的流程建模方法的可用性和实用性,并进一步完善它。

相似文献

1
SEIPS-based process modeling in primary care.
Appl Ergon. 2017 Apr;60:240-254. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
2
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
A human factors systems approach to understanding team-based primary care: a qualitative analysis.
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):721-726. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw093. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
5
Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Workflow process mapping to characterize office-based primary care medication use and safety: A conceptual approach.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Apr;15(4):378-386. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
7
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
8
Work system barriers and facilitators in inpatient care transitions of pediatric trauma patients.
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
A qualitative assessment of a community pharmacy cognitive pharmaceutical services program, using a work system approach.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

2
From awareness to action: Facilitators and advocacy in healthcare by autistic adults.
Autism. 2025 May 27:13623613251343350. doi: 10.1177/13623613251343350.
3
Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Review of Recent Developments and Advances.
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):196-209. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800744. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
7
Exploring research and education opportunities in digital health for pharmacy, medicine and other health disciplines: Insights from a multinational workshop.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jun 22;15:100469. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100469. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Integrating human factors engineering into your pediatric radiology practice.
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 May;54(6):936-943. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05903-x. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Closing the loop: a process evaluation of inpatient care team communication.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):30-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004580. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
2
Quantitative ethnographic study of physician workflow and interactions with electronic health record systems.
Int J Ind Ergon. 2015 Sep 1;49:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.04.004.
3
Perceived Impact of Care Managers' Work on Patient and Clinician Outcomes.
Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2015;3(2):158-167. doi: 10.5750/ejpch.v3i2.903.
4
Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety.
Ergonomics. 2015;58(4):565-99. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
5
Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety--developing the conceptual framework.
Ergonomics. 2015;58(4):548-64. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015623. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
6
Modelling and simulation of complex sociotechnical systems: envisioning and analysing work environments.
Ergonomics. 2015;58(4):600-14. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1008586. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
7
Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities.
Ergonomics. 2015;58(4):650-8. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1011241. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
8
Human factors and ergonomics and quality improvement science: integrating approaches for safety in healthcare.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):250-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003623. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验