Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Hospital-based care of pediatric trauma patients includes transitions between units that are critical for quality of care and patient safety. Using a macroergonomics approach, we identify work system barriers and facilitators in care transitions. We interviewed eighteen healthcare professionals involved in transitions from emergency department (ED) to operating room (OR), OR to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and ED to PICU. We applied the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) process modeling method and identified nine dimensions of barriers and facilitators - anticipation, ED decision making, interacting with family, physical environment, role ambiguity, staffing/resources, team cognition, technology and characteristic of trauma care. For example, handoffs involving all healthcare professionals in the OR to PICU transition created a shared understanding of the patient, but sometimes included distractions. Understanding barriers and facilitators can guide future improvements, e.g., designing a team display to support team cognition of healthcare professionals in the care transitions.
儿科创伤患者的医院内护理包括在各科室之间的交接,这对护理质量和患者安全至关重要。我们采用宏观工效学方法,在护理交接中确定工作系统障碍和促进因素。我们采访了 18 名参与从急诊科(ED)到手术室(OR)、OR 到儿科重症监护病房(PICU)以及 ED 到 PICU 交接的医疗保健专业人员。我们应用了患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)过程建模方法,并确定了障碍和促进因素的九个维度 - 预期、ED 决策、与家属互动、物理环境、角色模糊、人员配备/资源、团队认知、技术和创伤护理的特点。例如,OR 到 PICU 交接中涉及所有医疗保健专业人员的交接会形成对患者的共同理解,但有时也会出现干扰。了解障碍和促进因素可以指导未来的改进,例如,设计一个团队显示器,以支持护理交接中医疗保健专业人员的团队认知。