Suppr超能文献

儿科创伤患者住院护理交接中的工作系统障碍和促进因素。

Work system barriers and facilitators in inpatient care transitions of pediatric trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Abstract

Hospital-based care of pediatric trauma patients includes transitions between units that are critical for quality of care and patient safety. Using a macroergonomics approach, we identify work system barriers and facilitators in care transitions. We interviewed eighteen healthcare professionals involved in transitions from emergency department (ED) to operating room (OR), OR to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and ED to PICU. We applied the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) process modeling method and identified nine dimensions of barriers and facilitators - anticipation, ED decision making, interacting with family, physical environment, role ambiguity, staffing/resources, team cognition, technology and characteristic of trauma care. For example, handoffs involving all healthcare professionals in the OR to PICU transition created a shared understanding of the patient, but sometimes included distractions. Understanding barriers and facilitators can guide future improvements, e.g., designing a team display to support team cognition of healthcare professionals in the care transitions.

摘要

儿科创伤患者的医院内护理包括在各科室之间的交接,这对护理质量和患者安全至关重要。我们采用宏观工效学方法,在护理交接中确定工作系统障碍和促进因素。我们采访了 18 名参与从急诊科(ED)到手术室(OR)、OR 到儿科重症监护病房(PICU)以及 ED 到 PICU 交接的医疗保健专业人员。我们应用了患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)过程建模方法,并确定了障碍和促进因素的九个维度 - 预期、ED 决策、与家属互动、物理环境、角色模糊、人员配备/资源、团队认知、技术和创伤护理的特点。例如,OR 到 PICU 交接中涉及所有医疗保健专业人员的交接会形成对患者的共同理解,但有时也会出现干扰。了解障碍和促进因素可以指导未来的改进,例如,设计一个团队显示器,以支持护理交接中医疗保健专业人员的团队认知。

相似文献

1
Work system barriers and facilitators in inpatient care transitions of pediatric trauma patients.
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Care transition of trauma patients: Processes with articulation work before and after handoff.
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103606. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103606. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
4
Team performance during postsurgical patient handovers in paediatric care.
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;179(4):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03547-w. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
Tales from the Trips: A Qualitative Study of Timely Recognition, Treatment, and Transfer of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 May;28(5):1219-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
Information flow during pediatric trauma care transitions: things falling through the cracks.
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;14(5):797-805. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02110-7. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
Flow disruptions in trauma care handoffs.
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.038. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
9
Team Cognition in Handoffs: Relating System Factors, Team Cognition Functions and Outcomes in Two Handoff Processes.
Hum Factors. 2024 Jan;66(1):271-293. doi: 10.1177/00187208221086342. Epub 2022 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

2
The Effects of Health Information Technology on Quality of Care in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;8(7):e70962. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70962. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
A SEIPS-Based Analysis to Understand Safety Culture During Postpartum Hemorrhage.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;13(5):499. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050499.
5
Technological barriers to providing pediatric mental and behavioral healthcare in emergency departments.
Appl Ergon. 2025 May;125:104426. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104426. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
6
Macroergonomic components of the patient work system shaping dyadic care management during adolescence: a case study of type 1 diabetes.
Ergonomics. 2024 Nov;67(11):1575-1595. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2343942. Epub 2024 May 7.
7
Work system barriers and facilitators of a team health information technology.
Appl Ergon. 2023 Nov;113:104105. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104105. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
9
Systematic Approach for Comparing Team-based Care Processes.
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2022 Sep;66(1):580-584. doi: 10.1177/1071181322661079. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
10
Situation Awareness-Oriented Dashboard in ICUs in Support of Resource Management in Time of Pandemics.
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023 Jan 31;11:151-160. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3241215. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: Implications for multi-level awareness.
Cogn Technol Work. 2019 Aug;21(3):397-416. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Postoperative patient handovers-Variability in perceptions of quality: A qualitative focus group study.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(3-4):663-676. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14662. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
4
Mapping the Flow of Pediatric Trauma Patients Using Process Mining.
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):654-666. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668089. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Design for patient safety: a systems-based risk identification framework.
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1046-1064. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1437224. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Evaluation of system mapping approaches in identifying patient safety risks.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 1;30(3):227-233. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx176.
9
Inadequate hand-off communication.
Sentinel Event Alert. 2017 Sep 12(58):1-6.
10
The impact of secure messaging on workflow in primary care: Results of a multiple-case, multiple-method study.
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Apr;100:63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验