Suppr超能文献

儿科创伤患者住院护理交接中的工作系统障碍和促进因素。

Work system barriers and facilitators in inpatient care transitions of pediatric trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Abstract

Hospital-based care of pediatric trauma patients includes transitions between units that are critical for quality of care and patient safety. Using a macroergonomics approach, we identify work system barriers and facilitators in care transitions. We interviewed eighteen healthcare professionals involved in transitions from emergency department (ED) to operating room (OR), OR to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and ED to PICU. We applied the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) process modeling method and identified nine dimensions of barriers and facilitators - anticipation, ED decision making, interacting with family, physical environment, role ambiguity, staffing/resources, team cognition, technology and characteristic of trauma care. For example, handoffs involving all healthcare professionals in the OR to PICU transition created a shared understanding of the patient, but sometimes included distractions. Understanding barriers and facilitators can guide future improvements, e.g., designing a team display to support team cognition of healthcare professionals in the care transitions.

摘要

儿科创伤患者的医院内护理包括在各科室之间的交接,这对护理质量和患者安全至关重要。我们采用宏观工效学方法,在护理交接中确定工作系统障碍和促进因素。我们采访了 18 名参与从急诊科(ED)到手术室(OR)、OR 到儿科重症监护病房(PICU)以及 ED 到 PICU 交接的医疗保健专业人员。我们应用了患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)过程建模方法,并确定了障碍和促进因素的九个维度 - 预期、ED 决策、与家属互动、物理环境、角色模糊、人员配备/资源、团队认知、技术和创伤护理的特点。例如,OR 到 PICU 交接中涉及所有医疗保健专业人员的交接会形成对患者的共同理解,但有时也会出现干扰。了解障碍和促进因素可以指导未来的改进,例如,设计一个团队显示器,以支持护理交接中医疗保健专业人员的团队认知。

相似文献

4
Team performance during postsurgical patient handovers in paediatric care.儿科术后患者交接过程中的团队表现。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;179(4):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03547-w. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Flow disruptions in trauma care handoffs.创伤护理交接班中的流程中断。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.038. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

9
Systematic Approach for Comparing Team-based Care Processes.比较基于团队的护理流程的系统方法。
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2022 Sep;66(1):580-584. doi: 10.1177/1071181322661079. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

4
Mapping the Flow of Pediatric Trauma Patients Using Process Mining.运用流程挖掘技术绘制儿科创伤患者的救治流程
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):654-666. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668089. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Design for patient safety: a systems-based risk identification framework.患者安全设计:基于系统的风险识别框架
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1046-1064. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1437224. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Inadequate hand-off communication.交接班沟通不足。
Sentinel Event Alert. 2017 Sep 12(58):1-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验