Verduin Maikel, Zindler Jaap D, Martinussen Hanneke M A, Jansen Rob L H, Croes Sander, Hendriks Lizza E L, Eekers Danielle B P, Hoeben Ann
Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Oncologist. 2017 Feb;22(2):222-235. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0117. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
The incidence of brain metastases of solid tumors is increasing. Local treatment of brain metastases is generally straightforward: cranial radiotherapy (e.g., whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery) or resection when feasible. However, treatment becomes more complex when brain metastases occur while other metastases, outside of the central nervous system, are being controlled with systemic therapy (chemotherapeutics, molecular targeted agents, or monoclonal antibodies). It is known that some anticancer agents can increase the risk for neurotoxicity when used concurrently with radiotherapy. Increased neurotoxicity decreases quality of life, which is undesirable in this predominantly palliative patient group. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify the compounds that should be temporarily discontinued when cranial radiotherapy is needed.This review summarizes the (neuro)toxicity data for combining systemic therapy (chemotherapeutics, molecular targeted agents, or monoclonal antibodies) with concurrent radiotherapy of brain metastases. Because only a limited amount of high-level data has been published, a risk assessment of each agent was done, taking into account the characteristics of each compound (e.g., lipophilicity) and the microenvironment of brain metastasis. The available trials suggest that only gemcitabine, erlotinib, and vemurafenib induce significant neurotoxicity when used concurrently with cranial radiotherapy. We conclude that for most systemic therapies, the currently available literature does not show an increase in neurotoxicity when these therapies are used concurrently with cranial radiotherapy. However, further studies are needed to confirm safety because there is no high-level evidence to permit definitive conclusions. 2017;22:222-235 The treatment of symptomatic brain metastases diagnosed while patients are receiving systemic therapy continues to pose a dilemma to clinicians. Will concurrent treatment with cranial radiotherapy and systemic therapy (chemotherapeutics, molecular targeted agents, and monoclonal antibodies), used to control intra- and extracranial tumor load, increase the risk for neurotoxicity? This review addresses this clinically relevant question and evaluates the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial radiotherapy, based on currently available literature, in order to determine the need to and interval to interrupt systemic treatment.
实体瘤脑转移的发生率正在上升。脑转移的局部治疗通常较为直接:可行时进行颅脑放疗(如全脑放疗或立体定向放射外科手术)或切除。然而,当脑转移发生时,而中枢神经系统以外的其他转移灶正在通过全身治疗(化疗药物、分子靶向药物或单克隆抗体)进行控制时,治疗会变得更加复杂。已知一些抗癌药物与放疗同时使用时会增加神经毒性风险。神经毒性增加会降低生活质量,这在这个以姑息治疗为主的患者群体中是不可取的。因此,确定在需要进行颅脑放疗时应暂时停用的化合物至关重要。本综述总结了全身治疗(化疗药物、分子靶向药物或单克隆抗体)与脑转移同步放疗联合使用时的(神经)毒性数据。由于仅发表了有限数量的高级别数据,因此考虑到每种化合物的特性(如亲脂性)和脑转移的微环境,对每种药物进行了风险评估。现有试验表明,只有吉西他滨、厄洛替尼和维莫非尼与颅脑放疗同时使用时会引起显著的神经毒性。我们得出结论,对于大多数全身治疗,目前的文献并未显示这些治疗与颅脑放疗同时使用时神经毒性会增加。然而,由于没有高级别证据得出明确结论,因此需要进一步研究以确认安全性。2017;22:222 - 235 在患者接受全身治疗期间诊断出的有症状脑转移的治疗,仍然给临床医生带来两难困境。用于控制颅内和颅外肿瘤负荷的颅脑放疗与全身治疗(化疗药物、分子靶向药物和单克隆抗体)同时进行,会增加神经毒性风险吗?本综述探讨了这个临床相关问题,并根据现有文献评估全身治疗与颅脑放疗联合使用的毒性,以确定是否需要以及中断全身治疗的间隔时间。