Meyer-Rochow V Benno
Department of Genetics and Physiology, Oulu University, Oulu, SF-90140, Finland.
Research Institute of Luminous Organisms, Hachijo, Nakanogo, Hachijojima, Tokyo, 100-1623, Japan.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Feb 7;13(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0136-0.
Traditional healing methods involving hundreds of insect and other invertebrate species are reviewed. Some of the uses are based on the tenet of "similia similibus" (let likes be cured by likes), but not all non-conventional health promoting practices should be dismissed as superstition or wishful thinking, for they have stood the test of time. Two questions are addressed: how can totally different organ systems in a human possibly benefit from extracts, potions, powders, secretions, ashes, etc. of a single species and how can different target organs, e.g. bronchi, lungs, the urinary bladder, kidneys, etc. apparently respond to a range of taxonomically not even closely related species? Even though therapeutically used invertebrates are generally small, they nevertheless possess organs for specific functions, e.g. digestion, gas exchange, reproduction. They have a nervous system, endocrine glands, a heart and muscle tissue and they contain a multitude of different molecules like metabolites, enzymes, hormones, neurotransmitters, secretions, etc. that have come under increased scientific scrutiny for pharmacological properties. Bearing that in mind it seems likely that a single species prepared and used in different ways could have a multitude of uses. But how, for example, can there be remedies for breathing and other problems, involving earthworms, molluscs, termites, beetles, cockroaches, bugs, and dragonflies? Since invertebrates themselves can suffer from infections and cancers, common defence reactions are likely to have evolved in all invertebrates, which is why it would be far more surprising to find that each species had evolved its own unique disease fighting system. To obtain a more comprehensive picture, however, we still need information on folk medicinal uses of insects and other invertebrates from a wider range of regions and ethnic groups, but this task is hampered by western-based medicines becoming increasingly dominant and traditional healers being unable and sometimes even unwilling to transmit their knowledge to the younger generation. However, collecting and uncontrolled uses of therapeutic invertebrates can put undue pressure on certain highly sought after species and this is something that has to be borne in mind as well.
本文综述了涉及数百种昆虫及其他无脊椎动物物种的传统治疗方法。其中一些用途基于“以类治类”的原则,但并非所有非传统的促进健康做法都应被视为迷信或一厢情愿的想法,因为它们经受住了时间的考验。文中探讨了两个问题:人类完全不同的器官系统如何能从单一物种的提取物、药剂、粉末、分泌物、灰烬等中受益,以及不同的靶器官,如支气管、肺、膀胱、肾脏等,如何能明显对一系列分类学上甚至没有密切关系的物种产生反应?尽管用于治疗的无脊椎动物通常体型较小,但它们仍拥有执行特定功能的器官,如消化、气体交换、繁殖器官。它们有神经系统、内分泌腺、心脏和肌肉组织,并且含有多种不同的分子,如代谢物、酶、激素、神经递质、分泌物等,这些分子因其药理特性而受到越来越多的科学研究。考虑到这一点,单一物种以不同方式制备和使用可能有多种用途似乎是合理的。但是,例如,蚯蚓、软体动物、白蚁、甲虫、蟑螂、臭虫和蜻蜓怎么会有治疗呼吸和其他问题的药物呢?由于无脊椎动物自身也会遭受感染和癌症,所有无脊椎动物可能都进化出了常见的防御反应,这就是为什么发现每个物种都进化出自己独特的抗病系统会更令人惊讶。然而,为了获得更全面的情况,我们仍然需要来自更广泛地区和族群的关于昆虫及其他无脊椎动物民间药用的信息,但这项任务受到以西医药为主导的影响,传统治疗师无法甚至有时不愿意将他们的知识传授给年轻一代。此外,收集和无节制地使用治疗性无脊椎动物会给某些备受追捧的物种带来过大压力,这一点也必须牢记在心。