• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔感觉暴露持续时间和强度操作对饱腹感的比较。

Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation.

作者信息

Lasschuijt M P, Mars M, Stieger M, Miquel-Kergoat S, de Graaf C, Smeets Pam

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands.

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2017 Jul 1;176:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.003
PMID:28174138
Abstract

Oro-sensory exposure (OSE) is an important factor in the regulation of food intake with increasing OSE leading to lower food intake. Oral processing time and taste intensity both play an important role in OSE but their individual contribution to satiation is unknown. We aimed to determine the independent and combined effects of oral processing time and taste intensity on satiation. Fifty eight participants (23±9y, BMI 22±2kg/m) participated in a 2×2 factorial randomized crossover study in which they consumed one of four gel-based model foods until satiation during four sessions. Model foods were offered ad libitum and differed in texture (soft or hard texture, yielding shorter and longer oral processing time) and sweetness (low or high intensity). Model foods were isocaloric and were matched for flavor and palatability. Outcome measures were intake of the model food and the microstructure of eating behavior, such as number of chews and eating rate. There was an overall significant effect of texture (p<0.001) but not sweetness (p=0.33) on intake with a 29.2% higher intake of the soft model foods compared to the hard model foods. After correction for palatability the difference in intake between the soft and hard model foods was 21.5% (p<0.001). The number of chews was significantly lower for the soft (10.1±6.2) than for the hard (26.9±6.2) model foods (p<0.001), which resulted in a significantly lower eating rate (soft, 26.3±10.2 and hard, 15.3±7.1g/min, p<0.001). These results show that increasing texture hardness of gel model foods decreases food intake independent of sweet taste intensity. The higher number of chews and faster eating rate may cause this effect. In conclusion, oro-sensory exposure duration rather than taste intensity appears to be the main determinant of food intake.

摘要

口腔感觉暴露(OSE)是调节食物摄入量的一个重要因素,OSE增加会导致食物摄入量降低。口腔加工时间和味觉强度在OSE中都起着重要作用,但它们对饱腹感的个体贡献尚不清楚。我们旨在确定口腔加工时间和味觉强度对饱腹感的独立和综合影响。58名参与者(23±9岁,体重指数22±2kg/m²)参加了一项2×2析因随机交叉研究,在四个实验环节中,他们食用四种基于凝胶的模型食物中的一种直至饱腹感。模型食物可随意食用,质地(软或硬质地,分别产生较短和较长的口腔加工时间)和甜度(低强度或高强度)不同。模型食物热量相等,风味和适口性相匹配。观察指标为模型食物的摄入量以及进食行为的微观结构,如咀嚼次数和进食速度。质地对摄入量有总体显著影响(p<0.001),而甜度对摄入量无显著影响(p=0.33),软质模型食物的摄入量比硬质模型食物高29.2%。校正适口性后,软质和硬质模型食物之间的摄入量差异为21.5%(p<0.001)。软质模型食物的咀嚼次数(10.1±6.2)显著低于硬质模型食物(26.9±6.2)(p<0.001),这导致进食速度显著降低(软质为26.3±10.2,硬质为15.3±7.1g/分钟,p<0.001)。这些结果表明,增加凝胶模型食物的质地硬度可降低食物摄入量,与甜味强度无关。较高的咀嚼次数和更快的进食速度可能导致这种效果。总之,口腔感觉暴露持续时间而非味觉强度似乎是食物摄入量的主要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation.口腔感觉暴露持续时间和强度操作对饱腹感的比较。
Physiol Behav. 2017 Jul 1;176:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
2
Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation.固体咸味餐食成分的口腔加工特性,以及与食物成分、感官属性和预期饱腹感的关系。
Appetite. 2013 Jan;60(1):208-219. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.015. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
3
The effect of textural complexity of solid foods on satiation.固体食物的质地复杂性对饱腹感的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Sep 1;163:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.042. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Exacting Responses: Lack of Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses Upon Oro-Sensory Exposure.精确反应:口腔感觉暴露时缺乏内分泌头期反应。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Jun 13;9:332. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00332. eCollection 2018.
5
Texture and satiation: the role of oro-sensory exposure time.质地和饱腹感:口部感官暴露时间的作用。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Nov 5;107(4):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 May 15.
6
Correlation of instrumental texture properties from textural profile analysis (TPA) with eating behaviours and macronutrient composition for a wide range of solid foods.纹理剖面分析(TPA)仪器质地特性与广泛固体食物的进食行为和宏量营养素组成的相关性。
Food Funct. 2018 Oct 17;9(10):5301-5312. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00791h.
7
Effects of Oro-Sensory Exposure on Satiation and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms-What Do We Know So Far?味觉感知暴露对饱腹感的影响及其潜在的神经生理学机制——我们目前了解多少?
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 21;13(5):1391. doi: 10.3390/nu13051391.
8
Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction in energy intake over the course of the day.慢食:较硬食物对全天能量摄入减少的持续影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e93370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093370. eCollection 2014.
9
Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time meal.质地和口感对实际午餐时间一餐中食物摄入的影响。
Appetite. 2013 Jan;60(1):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
10
Small food texture modifications can be used to change oral processing behaviour and to control ad libitum food intake.小的食物质地改变可以用来改变口腔加工行为,从而控制随意进食。
Appetite. 2019 Nov 1;142:104375. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104375. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Consistent effect of eating rate on food and energy intake across twenty-four meals.进食速度对24餐食物和能量摄入的持续影响。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 16;132(4):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524001478.
2
The heat is on: Consumers modify their oral processing behavior when eating spicy foods.热度来袭:消费者在食用辛辣食物时会改变其口腔加工行为。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Sep 29;7:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100597. eCollection 2023.
3
Speed limits: the effects of industrial food processing and food texture on daily energy intake and eating behaviour in healthy adults.
限速:工业食品加工和食品质地对健康成年人日常能量摄入和饮食行为的影响。
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Oct;62(7):2949-2962. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03202-z. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Interrelations Between Food Form, Texture, and Matrix Influence Energy Intake and Metabolic Responses.食物形态、质地和基质的相互关系影响能量摄入和代谢反应。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Jun;11(2):124-132. doi: 10.1007/s13668-022-00413-4. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Short and Long-Term Innovations on Dietary Behavior Assessment and Coaching: Present Efforts and Vision of the Pride and Prejudice Consortium.饮食行为评估和辅导的短期和长期创新:Pride and Prejudice 联盟的现有努力和愿景。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7877. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157877.
6
Oral Processing, Satiation and Obesity: Overview and Hypotheses.口腔加工、饱腹感与肥胖:概述与假说
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Jul 26;14:3399-3415. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S314379. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of Oro-Sensory Exposure on Satiation and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms-What Do We Know So Far?味觉感知暴露对饱腹感的影响及其潜在的神经生理学机制——我们目前了解多少?
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 21;13(5):1391. doi: 10.3390/nu13051391.
8
Sensory and physical characteristics of foods that impact food intake without affecting acceptability: Systematic review and meta-analyses.食品的感官和物理特性会影响食物摄入,而不影响可接受性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2021 Aug;22(8):e13234. doi: 10.1111/obr.13234. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Food texture influences on satiety: systematic review and meta-analysis.食物质地对饱腹感的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 31;10(1):12929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69504-y.
10
Good taste or gut feeling? A new method in rats shows oro-sensory stimulation and gastric distention generate distinct and overlapping brain activation patterns.好味道还是直觉?新方法在大鼠中表明口腔感觉刺激和胃扩张产生不同且重叠的大脑激活模式。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jul;54(7):1116-1126. doi: 10.1002/eat.23354. Epub 2020 Jul 15.