Suppr超能文献

让癌症患儿参与健康促进研究:一项描述原因、内容和方式的案例研究

Involving Children With Cancer in Health Promotive Research: A Case Study Describing Why, What, and How.

作者信息

Nygren Jens M, Lindberg Susanne, Wärnestål Pontus, Svedberg Petra

机构信息

School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.

School of Information Technology, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Feb 7;6(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7094.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participatory research approaches have been introduced to meet end-users' needs in the development of health promotion interventions among children. However, whereas children are increasingly involved as passive informants in particular parts of research, they are rarely involved as partners, equal to adult researchers, throughout the research process. This is especially prominent in the context of child health where the child is commonly considered to be vulnerable or when the research concerns sensitive situations. In these cases, researchers and gatekeepers to children's involvement base their resistance to active involvement of children on potential adverse effects on the accuracy or quality of the research or on ethical or moral principles that participation might harm the child. Thus most research aimed at developing health promotion interventions for children in health care is primarily based on the involvement of parents, caregivers, and other stakeholders.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to discuss reasons for involving children in health promotive research and to explore models for children's participation in research as a basis for describing how researchers can use design methodology and participatory approaches to support the participation and contribution of children in a vulnerable context.

METHODS

We developed and applied a model for children's participation in research to the development of a digital peer support service for children cancer survivors. This guided the selection of appropriate research and design methodologies (such as interviews, focus groups, design sessions, and usability evaluation) for involving the children cancer survivors (8-12 years) in the design of a digital peer support service.

RESULTS

We present a model for what children's participation in research means and describe how we practically implemented this model in a research project on children with cancer. This paper can inform researchers in their planning of strategies for children's participation and ensure future development of health promotion interventions for children is based on their perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges in reaching a suitable degree of participation during a research project involve both creating opportunities for children to have genuine influence on the research process and organizing this involvement so that they feel they understand what they are involved in and why. To achieve this, it is essential to enable children to be involved in research over time to gain confidence in the researchers and to develop children's abilities to make decisions throughout the research processes.

摘要

背景

参与式研究方法已被引入,以满足儿童健康促进干预措施开发中终端用户的需求。然而,尽管儿童在研究的特定部分越来越多地作为被动信息提供者参与其中,但在整个研究过程中,他们很少作为与成年研究人员平等的伙伴参与。这在儿童健康领域尤为突出,因为儿童通常被认为是弱势群体,或者研究涉及敏感情况。在这些情况下,研究人员和儿童参与的把关人抵制儿童积极参与,理由是这可能会对研究的准确性或质量产生潜在不利影响,或者基于参与可能会伤害儿童的伦理或道德原则。因此,大多数旨在为医疗保健中的儿童开发健康促进干预措施的研究主要基于父母、照顾者和其他利益相关者的参与。

目的

本文的目的是讨论让儿童参与健康促进研究的原因,并探索儿童参与研究的模式,以此为基础描述研究人员如何使用设计方法和参与式方法,以支持处于弱势背景下的儿童参与并做出贡献。

方法

我们开发并应用了一个儿童参与研究的模式,用于为癌症幸存儿童开发数字同伴支持服务。这指导了选择合适的研究和设计方法(如访谈、焦点小组、设计会议和可用性评估),以使癌症幸存儿童(8至12岁)参与数字同伴支持服务的设计。

结果

我们提出了一个关于儿童参与研究意味着什么的模式,并描述了我们如何在一个针对癌症儿童的研究项目中实际实施该模式。本文可为研究人员规划儿童参与策略提供参考,并确保未来针对儿童的健康促进干预措施基于他们的观点进行开发。

结论

在研究项目中实现适当程度的参与面临的挑战包括为儿童创造对研究过程产生真正影响的机会,以及组织这种参与,使他们觉得自己理解所参与的内容及其原因。要实现这一点,至关重要的是让儿童随着时间的推移参与研究,以获得对研究人员的信任,并培养儿童在整个研究过程中做出决策的能力。

相似文献

2
Improving Identification and Child-Focused Collaborative Care for Children of Parents With a Mental Illness in Tyrol, Austria.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 17;10:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00233. eCollection 2019.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
6
The extent and nature of children's involvement in food practice research: a scoping review of qualitative studies.
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):2836-2848. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001891. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
Children's active participation in decision-making processes during hospitalisation: An observational study.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4525-4537. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15042. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9

引用本文的文献

1
The use of personas to involve consumers in healthcare co-design: a scoping review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 6;25(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12786-7.
3
SoCap YMH - youth mental health, social capital and help-seeking: a study protocol.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 11;12:1406649. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406649. eCollection 2024.
4
Using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for chronic pain: A scoping review and narrative synthesis.
Internet Interv. 2023 Apr 3;32:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100619. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Children, young people and parent engagement in health intervention design and implementation: A scoping review.
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/hex.13572. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
A Legal Framework to Support Development and Assessment of Digital Health Services.
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 May 25;4(2):e17. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5401.
2
Support from healthcare services during transition to adulthood - Experiences of young adult survivors of pediatric cancer.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;21:105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
A "Child's Rights Perspective": The "Right" of Children and Young People to Participate in Health Care Research.
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2015;38(3):161-80. doi: 10.3109/01460862.2015.1042171.
4
Friendship relations from the perspective of children with experience of cancer treatment: a focus group study with a salutogenic approach.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;32(3):153-64. doi: 10.1177/1043454214554009. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
5
Revisiting Mandell's 'least adult' role and engaging with children's voices in research.
Nurse Res. 2012;19(3):39-43. doi: 10.7748/nr2012.04.19.3.39.c9058.
6
Participation in perspective: reflections from research projects.
Nurse Res. 2012;19(2):17-22. doi: 10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.17.c8904.
7
Involving young people as co-researchers in a photography project.
Nurse Res. 2012;19(2):11-6. doi: 10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.11.c8903.
8
Research with children and young people: practical considerations.
Nurse Res. 2012;19(2):4-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.19.2.4.s2.
9
Perspectives on quality and content of information on the internet for adolescents with cancer.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Jul 15;57(1):97-104. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23068. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
10
Accessing children as research participants: examining the role of gatekeepers.
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jul;36(4):452-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01012.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验