Doozaneh Maryam, Koohpeima Fatemeh, Firouzmandi Maryam, Abbassiyan Forugh
Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):103-107. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.21.
The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite (SAFC) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement.
A total of 72 acrylic blocks with a central hole (4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth) were prepared. The holes were filled with MTA (sub group A) and CEM cement. The specimens of both restorative materials were divided into 6 groups; overall there were 12 groups. In groups 1 and 4, SAFC was used without bonding while in groups 2 and 5 SAFC was used with bonding agent. In all these groups the material was placed into the plastic mold and light cured. In groups 3 and 6, after surface conditioning with poly acrylic acid and rinsing, RMGI was placed into the mold and photo polymerized. After 24 h, the shear bond strength values were measured and fracture patterns were examined by a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA and student's t-test.
The use of bonding agent significantly increased the shear bond strength of FC to MTA and CEM cement (=0.008 and 0.00, respectively). In both materials, RMGI had the lowest shear bond strength values (2.25 Mpa in MTA and 1.32 Mpa in CEM). The mean shear bond strength were significantly higher in MTA specimen than CEM cement (=0.003). There was a significant differences between fracture patterns among groups (=0.001). Most failures were adhesive/mix in MTA specimen but in CEM cement groups the cohesive failures were observed in most of the samples.
The bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite resin to MTA and CEM cement was higher than RMGI which was improved after the additional application of adhesive.
本研究的目的是比较自粘结可流动复合树脂(SAFC)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGI)与矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)和富钙混合物(CEM)水泥的剪切粘结强度。
制备了72个带有中心孔(直径4毫米,深度2毫米)的丙烯酸树脂块。孔中填充MTA(A亚组)和CEM水泥。两种修复材料的标本分为6组;总共12组。在第1组和第4组中,未使用粘结剂使用SAFC,而在第2组和第5组中,使用粘结剂使用SAFC。在所有这些组中,将材料放入塑料模具中并光固化。在第3组和第6组中,用聚丙烯酸进行表面处理并冲洗后,将RMGI放入模具中并光聚合。24小时后,测量剪切粘结强度值,并通过体视显微镜检查断裂模式。使用双向方差分析和学生t检验分析数据。
粘结剂的使用显著提高了FC与MTA和CEM水泥的剪切粘结强度(分别为=0.008和0.00)。在两种材料中,RMGI的剪切粘结强度值最低(MTA中为2.25 Mpa,CEM中为1.32 Mpa)。MTA标本的平均剪切粘结强度显著高于CEM水泥(=0.003)。各组之间的断裂模式存在显著差异(=0.001)。MTA标本中的大多数失败是粘结/混合性的,但在CEM水泥组中,大多数样品中观察到内聚性失败。
自粘结可流动复合树脂与MTA和CEM水泥的粘结强度高于RMGI,在额外使用粘结剂后有所提高。