Suppr超能文献

应用三种不同粘结系统后复合树脂与牙髓盖髓生物材料的粘结强度

Bond strength of composite resin to pulp capping biomaterials after application of three different bonding systems.

作者信息

Jaberi-Ansari Zahra, Mahdilou Maryam, Ahmadyar Maryam, Asgary Saeed

机构信息

Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(3):152-6. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.024. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

Abstract

Background and aims. Bonding of composite resin filling materials to pulp protecting agents produces an adhesive joint which is important for the quality of filling as well as success of restoration. We aimed to assess the bond strength of composite resin to three pulp capping biomaterials: Pro Root mineral trioxide aggregate (PMTA), Root MTA (RMTA) and calcium enriched mixture (CEM) cement, using three bonding systems [a total-etch (Single Bond) and two self-etch systems (Protect bond and SE Bond)]. Materials and methods. Ninety acrylic molds, each containing a 6×2-mm hole, were divided into 3 groups and filled with PMTA, RMTA and CEM cements. The samples in each experimental group were then randomly divided into 3 sub-groups; Single Bond, Protect Bond and SE Bond bonding systems were applied to the tested materials. Cylindrical forms of composite resin (Z100, 2×2 mm) were placed onto the samples and cured. Shear bond strength values were measured for 9 subgroups using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results. The average shear bond strengths of Z100 composite resin after application of Single Bond, Protect Bond and SE Bond systems were as follows; PMTA: 5.1±2.42, 4.56±1.96 and 4.52±1.7; RMTA: 4.71±1.77, 4.31±0.56 and 4.79±1.88; and CEM cement: 4.75±1.1, 4.54±1.59 and 4.64±1.78 MPa, respectively. The type of pulp capping material, bonding system and their interacting effects did not have a significant effect on the bond strengths of composite resin to pulp capping biomaterials. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this in vitrostudy, bond strength of composite resin to two types of MTA as well as CEM cement were similar following application of the total-etch or self-etch bonding systems.

摘要

背景与目的。复合树脂充填材料与牙髓保护剂的粘结形成了一个粘结界面,这对于充填质量以及修复的成功与否至关重要。我们旨在使用三种粘结系统[一种全酸蚀系统(单键粘结剂)和两种自酸蚀系统(保护粘结剂和SE粘结剂)]评估复合树脂与三种牙髓盖髓生物材料的粘结强度:专业型三氧化矿物凝聚体(PMTA)、根用三氧化矿物凝聚体(RMTA)和富钙混合物(CEM)水泥。材料与方法。90个丙烯酸模具,每个模具中有一个6×2毫米的孔,分为3组,分别填充PMTA、RMTA和CEM水泥。然后将每个实验组中的样本随机分为3个亚组;将单键粘结剂、保护粘结剂和SE粘结剂系统应用于测试材料。将圆柱形复合树脂(Z100,2×2毫米)放置在样本上并固化。使用万能试验机测量9个亚组的剪切粘结强度值。数据采用双向方差分析进行分析。结果。应用单键粘结剂、保护粘结剂和SE粘结剂系统后,Z100复合树脂的平均剪切粘结强度如下:PMTA分别为5.1±2.42、4.56±1.96和4.52±1.7;RMTA分别为4.71±1.77、4.31±0.56和4.79±1.88;CEM水泥分别为4.75±1.1、4.54±1.59和4.64±1.78兆帕。牙髓盖髓材料的类型、粘结系统及其相互作用对复合树脂与牙髓盖髓生物材料的粘结强度没有显著影响。结论。在本体外研究的局限性范围内,应用全酸蚀或自酸蚀粘结系统后,复合树脂与两种类型的三氧化矿物凝聚体以及CEM水泥的粘结强度相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验