• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗接种建议与强制接种的有效性:来自甲型肝炎疫苗的证据。

Effectiveness of vaccination recommendations versus mandates: Evidence from the hepatitis A vaccine.

作者信息

Lawler Emily C

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Department of Economics, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37235, United States.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;52:45-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.01.002
PMID:28183000
Abstract

I provide novel evidence on the effectiveness of two vaccination policies - simple non-binding recommendations to vaccinate versus mandates requiring vaccination prior to childcare or kindergarten attendance - in the context of the only disease whose institutional features permit a credible examination of both: hepatitis A. Using provider-verified immunization data I find that recommendations significantly increased hepatitis A vaccination rates among young children by at least 20 percentage points, while mandates increase rates by another 8 percentage points. These policies also significantly reduced population hepatitis A incidence. My results suggest a range of policy options for addressing suboptimally low population vaccination rates.

摘要

我提供了关于两种疫苗接种政策有效性的新证据——一种是简单的非强制性接种建议,另一种是要求在儿童入托或上幼儿园前必须接种疫苗——这是在唯一一种其制度特征允许对这两种政策进行可靠检验的疾病背景下进行的:甲型肝炎。利用经提供者核实的免疫数据,我发现接种建议显著提高了幼儿甲型肝炎疫苗接种率,至少提高了20个百分点,而强制接种又使接种率提高了8个百分点。这些政策还显著降低了人群中甲型肝炎的发病率。我的研究结果为解决人群疫苗接种率过低的问题提供了一系列政策选择。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of vaccination recommendations versus mandates: Evidence from the hepatitis A vaccine.疫苗接种建议与强制接种的有效性:来自甲型肝炎疫苗的证据。
J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;52:45-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
2
Hepatitis A vaccination options for Australia.澳大利亚的甲型肝炎疫苗接种选择。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2003 Mar;39(2):83-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2003.00098.x.
3
Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).通过主动或被动免疫预防甲型肝炎:免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999 Oct 1;48(RR-12):1-37.
4
Public Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatitis A Vaccination in the United States: A Disease Transmission Dynamic Modeling Approach.美国甲型肝炎疫苗接种的公共卫生影响及成本效益:一种疾病传播动态建模方法
Value Health. 2015 Jun;18(4):358-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
5
Missed Opportunities for Hepatitis A Vaccination, National Immunization Survey-Child, 2013.2013年国家免疫接种调查-儿童:甲型肝炎疫苗接种的错失机会
J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;187:265-271.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 5.
6
Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).通过主动或被动免疫预防甲型肝炎:免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 May 19;55(RR-7):1-23.
7
Impact of hepatitis A vaccination on health care utilization in the United States, 1996-2004.1996 - 2004年美国甲型肝炎疫苗接种对医疗保健利用的影响
Vaccine. 2007 May 4;25(18):3581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.081. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
8
Hepatitis A: disease burden and current childhood vaccination strategies in the United States.甲型肝炎:美国的疾病负担与当前儿童疫苗接种策略
J Pediatr Health Care. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2006.12.011.
9
The changing epidemiology of hepatitis A in Arizona following intensive immunization programs (1988-2007).亚利桑那州强化免疫规划(1988-2007 年)后甲型肝炎的流行变化。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 14;30(42):6103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.029. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
The shifting epidemiology of hepatitis A following routine childhood immunization program in Israel.以色列实施儿童常规免疫规划后甲型肝炎流行病学的变化
Prev Med. 2007 Nov;45(5):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Hesitancy and compulsory vaccination: are non-mandatory vaccines the victims? A study on Italian regions.犹豫与强制接种疫苗:非强制性疫苗是受害者吗?一项关于意大利各地区的研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01805-3.
2
Internal and external factors affecting vaccination coverage: Modeling the interactions between vaccine hesitancy, accessibility, and mandates.影响疫苗接种覆盖率的内部和外部因素:模拟疫苗犹豫、可及性和强制接种之间的相互作用。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 4;3(10):e0001186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001186. eCollection 2023.
3
Association Between State-Issued COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and Vaccine Administration Rates in 12 US States and the District of Columbia.
美国 12 个州和哥伦比亚特区的州政府发布的 COVID-19 疫苗授权令与疫苗接种率之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223810. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3810.
4
Reminders of existing vaccine mandates increase support for a COVID-19 vaccine mandate: Evidence from a survey experiment.现有疫苗授权的提醒会增加对 COVID-19 疫苗授权的支持:一项调查实验的证据。
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 5;40(51):7483-7487. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
5
Primary care professionals' support for Covid-19 vaccination mandates: Findings from a US national survey.初级保健专业人员对新冠疫苗强制接种政策的支持:一项美国全国性调查的结果
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Aug;28:101849. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101849. Epub 2022 May 31.
6
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in eight European countries: Prevalence, determinants, and heterogeneity.八个欧洲国家对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:流行情况、决定因素及异质性
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 29;8(17):eabm9825. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9825. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
How do COVID-19 vaccine mandates affect attitudes toward the vaccine and participation in mandate-affected activities? Evidence from the United States.新冠疫苗强制接种令如何影响人们对接种疫苗的态度和参与受强制接种令影响的活动?来自美国的证据。
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 5;40(51):7460-7465. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.083. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Conditional cash lotteries increase COVID-19 vaccination rates.有条件现金彩票提高了 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
J Health Econ. 2022 Jan;81:102578. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102578. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
The contagion externality of a superspreading event: The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally and COVID-19.超级传播事件的传染外部性:斯特吉斯摩托车拉力赛与新冠疫情
South Econ J. 2021 Jan;87(3):769-807. doi: 10.1002/soej.12475. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
10
Vaccination take-up and health: Evidence from a flu vaccination program for the elderly.疫苗接种率与健康状况:来自一项针对老年人的流感疫苗接种计划的证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Nov;179:323-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 29.