• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事件指挥系统在学术环境下临床试验管理中的应用:原则与经验教训

Application of Incident Command Structure to clinical trial management in the academic setting: principles and lessons learned.

作者信息

Reynolds Penny S, Michael Mary J, Spiess Bruce D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.

Present address: Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Feb 9;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1755-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-016-1755-9
PMID:28183347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5301359/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial success depends on appropriate management, but practical guidance to trial organisation and planning is lacking. The Incident Command System (ICS) is the 'gold standard' management system developed for managing diverse operations in major incident and public health arenas. It enables effective and flexible management through integration of personnel, procedures, resources, and communications within a common hierarchical organisational structure. Conventional ICS organisation consists of five function modules: Command, Planning, Operations, Logistics, and Finance/Administration. Large clinical trials will require a separate Regulatory Administrative arm, and an Information arm, consisting of dedicated data management and information technology staff. We applied ICS principles to organisation and management of the Prehospital Use of Plasma in Traumatic Haemorrhage (PUPTH) trial. This trial was a multidepartmental, multiagency, randomised clinical trial investigating prehospital administration of thawed plasma on mortality and coagulation response in severely injured trauma patients. We describe the ICS system as it would apply to large clinical trials in general, and the benefits, barriers, and lessons learned in utilising ICS principles to reorganise and coordinate the PUPTH trial.

RESULTS

Without a formal trial management structure, early stages of the trial were characterised by inertia and organisational confusion. Implementing ICS improved organisation, coordination, and communication between multiple agencies and service groups, and greatly streamlined regulatory compliance administration. However, unfamiliarity of clinicians with ICS culture, conflicting resource allocation priorities, and communication bottlenecks were significant barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS is a flexible and powerful organisational tool for managing large complex clinical trials. However, for successful implementation the cultural, psychological, and social environment of trial participants must be accounted for, and personnel need to be educated in the basics of ICS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02303964 . Registered on 28 November 2014.

摘要

背景

临床试验的成功取决于恰当的管理,但目前缺乏针对试验组织与规划的实用指导。 incident指挥系统(ICS)是为管理重大事件和公共卫生领域的各类行动而开发的“黄金标准”管理系统。它通过在一个通用的层级组织结构内整合人员、程序、资源和通信,实现有效且灵活的管理。传统的ICS组织由五个功能模块组成:指挥、规划、行动、后勤以及财务/行政。大型临床试验将需要一个单独的监管行政部门以及一个信息部门,该信息部门由专门的数据管理和信息技术人员组成。我们将ICS原则应用于创伤性出血院前血浆使用(PUPTH)试验的组织与管理。这项试验是一项多部门、多机构的随机临床试验,旨在研究院前给予解冻血浆对严重创伤患者死亡率和凝血反应的影响。我们描述了ICS系统在一般大型临床试验中的应用方式,以及在利用ICS原则重组和协调PUPTH试验过程中的益处、障碍和经验教训。

结果

在没有正式试验管理结构的情况下,试验早期阶段表现为惰性和组织混乱。实施ICS改善了多个机构和服务组之间的组织、协调与沟通,并极大地简化了监管合规管理。然而,临床医生对ICS文化不熟悉、资源分配优先级冲突以及沟通瓶颈是重大障碍。

结论

ICS是管理大型复杂临床试验的灵活且强大的组织工具。然而,为了成功实施,必须考虑试验参与者的文化、心理和社会环境,并且需要对人员进行ICS基础知识培训。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02303964。于2014年11月28日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/4ea29bd01466/13063_2016_1755_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/dce57fb46048/13063_2016_1755_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/2ac98a702dd1/13063_2016_1755_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/4ea29bd01466/13063_2016_1755_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/dce57fb46048/13063_2016_1755_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/2ac98a702dd1/13063_2016_1755_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498c/5301359/4ea29bd01466/13063_2016_1755_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of Incident Command Structure to clinical trial management in the academic setting: principles and lessons learned.事件指挥系统在学术环境下临床试验管理中的应用:原则与经验教训
Trials. 2017 Feb 9;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1755-9.
2
Prehospital use of plasma in traumatic hemorrhage (The PUPTH Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.创伤性出血院前使用血浆(PUPTH试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 30;16:321. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0844-5.
3
iTACTIC - implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.iTACTIC——实施创伤性凝血病纠正治疗算法:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 18;18(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2224-9.
4
Prehospital Plasma during Air Medical Transport in Trauma Patients at Risk for Hemorrhagic Shock.创伤患者在航空医疗转运中发生出血性休克风险时的院前血浆治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):315-326. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802345.
5
Standardized emergency management system and response to a smallpox emergency.标准化应急管理系统与天花应急响应
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):313-20. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001266.
6
Telemedical support for prehospital Emergency Medical Service (TEMS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.院前急救医疗服务的远程医疗支持(TEMS试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 26;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1781-2.
7
Literature review on medical incident command.关于医疗事件指挥的文献综述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Apr;30(2):205-15. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Infrastructure and clinical practice for the detection and management of trauma-associated haemorrhage and coagulopathy.创伤相关出血和凝血功能障碍检测与管理的基础设施及临床实践
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug;41(4):413-20. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0455-y. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
9
Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma studY (FEISTY): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.严重创伤早期纤维蛋白原研究(FEISTY):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 May 26;18(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1980-x.
10
The ABC's of disaster response.灾难应对基础要点
Scand J Surg. 2005;94(4):259-66. doi: 10.1177/145749690509400403.

引用本文的文献

1
Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment.临床研究的项目管理挑战:定性批判性评估
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Apr;12(4):625-631. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1151_22. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehospital use of plasma in traumatic hemorrhage (The PUPTH Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.创伤性出血院前使用血浆(PUPTH试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 30;16:321. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0844-5.
2
An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies.对四大制药公司候选药物淘汰的分析。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Jul;14(7):475-86. doi: 10.1038/nrd4609. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
3
The natural history of conducting and reporting clinical trials: interviews with trialists.
开展和报告临床试验的自然历程:对试验者的访谈
Trials. 2015 Jan 26;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0536-6.
4
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Clinical investigator responsibilities.临床研究者的职责。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 Mar;7(2):124-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000216.
6
Lessons learned from a policy decision to coordinate a multijurisdiction H1N1 response with a single incident management team.从一项政策决策中吸取的教训,即协调多司法管辖区的 H1N1 应对工作,使用单一的事件管理团队。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181fd4cd2.
7
Managing clinical trials.临床试验管理。
Trials. 2010 Jul 13;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-78.
8
Utilization of an incident command system for a public health threat: West Nile virus in Nassau County, New York, 2008.利用突发事件指挥系统应对公共卫生威胁:2008 年纽约拿骚县的西尼罗河病毒。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):309-15. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181bb8392.
9
Ensuring integrity in industry-sponsored research: primum non nocere, revisited.确保行业资助研究的诚信:重温“首要不伤害原则”
JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1196-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.337.
10
Perfect study, poor evidence: interpretation of biases preceding study design.完美的研究,薄弱的证据:研究设计前偏差的解读
Semin Hematol. 2008 Jul;45(3):160-6. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.010.