Health Services Management Centre, Park House, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK.
Sociology and Social Policy Department, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06630-x.
Health systems are facing unprecedented socioeconomic pressures as well as the need to cope with the ongoing strain brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, the reconfiguration of health systems to encourage greater collaboration and integration has been promoted with a variety of collaborative shapes and forms being encouraged and developed. Despite this continued interest, evidence for success of these various arrangements is lacking, with the links between collaboration and improved performance often remaining uncertain. To date, many examinations of collaborations have been undertaken, but use of realist methodology may shed additional light on how and why collaboration works, and whom it benefits.
This paper seeks to test initial context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) of interorganisational collaboration with the view to producing a refined realist theory. This phase of the realist synthesis used case study and evaluation literature; combined with supplementary systematic searches. These searches were screened for rigour and relevance, after which CMOCs were extracted from included literature and compared against existing ones for refinement, refutation, or affirmation. We also identified demi-regularities to better explain how these CMOCs were interlinked.
Fifty-one papers were included, from which 338 CMOCs were identified, where many were analogous. This resulted in new mechanisms such as 'risk threshold' and refinement of many others, including trust, confidence, and faith, into more well-defined constructs. Refinement and addition of CMOCs enabled the creation of a 'web of causality' depicting how contextual factors form CMOC chains which generate outputs of collaborative behaviour. Core characteristics of collaborations, such as whether they were mandated or cross-sector, were explored for their proposed impact according to the theory.
The formulation of this refined realist theory allows for greater understanding of how and why collaborations work and can serve to inform both future work in this area and the implementation of these arrangements. Future work should delve deeper into collaborative subtypes and the underlying drivers of collaborative performance.
This review is part of a larger realist synthesis, registered at PROSPERO with ID CRD42019149009 .
医疗体系正面临前所未有的社会经济压力,同时也需要应对 COVID-19 大流行带来的持续压力。为应对这些挑战,医疗体系进行了重新配置,以鼓励更多的合作和整合,同时也鼓励并发展了各种合作形式。尽管人们对此一直很感兴趣,但缺乏这些各种安排成功的证据,合作与绩效提高之间的联系往往仍不确定。迄今为止,已经对许多合作进行了研究,但使用现实主义方法可能会进一步阐明合作如何以及为何起作用,以及对谁有益。
本文试图通过案例研究和评估文献检验组织间合作的初始背景-机制-结果配置(CMOC),以期产生更精细的现实主义理论。这一现实主义综合阶段使用了案例研究和评估文献;并结合了补充的系统搜索。对这些搜索进行了严格性和相关性的筛选,然后从纳入的文献中提取 CMOC,并与现有 CMOC 进行比较,以进行改进、反驳或确认。我们还确定了半规则,以更好地解释这些 CMOC 是如何相互关联的。
共纳入 51 篇文献,从中确定了 338 个 CMOC,其中许多是类似的。这导致了新的机制,如“风险阈值”,并对许多其他机制进行了细化,包括信任、信心和信念,使其成为更明确的结构。CMOC 的细化和添加使创建一个“因果关系网”成为可能,该网络描绘了背景因素如何形成产生合作行为输出的 CMOC 链。根据该理论,还探讨了合作的核心特征,例如它们是强制性的还是跨部门的,以及它们对合作绩效的预期影响。
该精炼现实主义理论的制定有助于更好地理解合作如何以及为何起作用,并可为该领域的未来工作和这些安排的实施提供信息。未来的工作应该更深入地研究合作的亚类型和合作绩效的潜在驱动因素。
本综述是更大的现实主义综合的一部分,在 PROSPERO 上注册,ID 为 CRD42019149009。