• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人员疏散模型中人类行为表示的模型用户指南。

Guidance for the Model User on Representing Human Behavior in Egress Models.

作者信息

Kuligowski Erica D, Gwynne Steven M V, Kinsey Michael J, Hulse Lynn

机构信息

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Fire Technol. 2017 Mar;53(2):649-672. doi: 10.1007/s10694-016-0586-2. Epub 2016 May 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10694-016-0586-2
PMID:28184099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5292781/
Abstract

Structures are currently designed and constructed in accordance with prescriptive and performance-based (PBD) methodologies to ensure a certain level of occupant safety during fire emergencies. The performance-based approach requires the quantification of both ASET (Available Safe Egress Time) and RSET (Required Safe Egress Time) to determine the degree of safety provided. This article focuses on the RSET side of the equation, for which a fire protection or fire safety engineer would use some type of egress modelling approach to estimate evacuation performance. Often, simple engineering equations are applied to estimate the RSET value. Over time, more sophisticated computational tools have appeared-that go beyond basic flow calculations; e.g. simulating individual agent movement. Irrespective of the approach adopted, appropriate and accurate representation of human behavior in response to fire within these approaches is limited, mainly due to the lack of a comprehensive conceptual model of evacuee decision-making and behavior during fire emergencies. This article initially presents the set of behavioral statements, or mini-theories, currently available from various fire and disaster studies, organized using the overarching theory of decision-making and human behavior in disasters. Once presented, guidance is provided on how these behavioral statements might be incorporated into an evacuation model, in order to better represent human behavior in fire within the safety analysis being performed. The intent here is to improve the accuracy of the results produced by performance-based calculations and analyses.

摘要

目前,建筑结构的设计和建造遵循规定性和基于性能的(PBD)方法,以确保在火灾紧急情况下为居住者提供一定程度的安全保障。基于性能的方法要求对可用安全疏散时间(ASET)和所需安全疏散时间(RSET)进行量化,以确定所提供的安全程度。本文重点关注等式中的RSET部分,消防或消防安全工程师会使用某种类型的疏散建模方法来估计疏散性能。通常,会应用简单的工程方程来估计RSET值。随着时间的推移,出现了更复杂的计算工具——这些工具超越了基本的流量计算;例如,模拟个体人员的移动。无论采用何种方法,在这些方法中对火灾情况下人类行为的适当和准确表示都很有限,主要是因为缺乏一个全面的火灾紧急情况下疏散人员决策和行为的概念模型。本文首先介绍了目前从各种火灾和灾害研究中获得的一组行为陈述或微型理论,这些陈述或理论是根据灾害中决策和人类行为的总体理论组织起来的。介绍完这些内容后,将提供有关如何将这些行为陈述纳入疏散模型的指导,以便在正在进行的安全分析中更好地表示火灾中的人类行为。这里的目的是提高基于性能的计算和分析所产生结果的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/20820f1df4fe/nihms826593f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/e9784e3f5db4/nihms826593f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/9d21bdda7275/nihms826593f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/20820f1df4fe/nihms826593f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/e9784e3f5db4/nihms826593f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/9d21bdda7275/nihms826593f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/5292781/20820f1df4fe/nihms826593f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Guidance for the Model User on Representing Human Behavior in Egress Models.人员疏散模型中人类行为表示的模型用户指南。
Fire Technol. 2017 Mar;53(2):649-672. doi: 10.1007/s10694-016-0586-2. Epub 2016 May 24.
2
Fire safety status and evacuation of medical facility considering elevated oxygen concentrations.考虑到氧气浓度升高时医疗设施的消防安全状况与疏散情况
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 31;10(17):e36847. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36847. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
3
Specific egress directives enhance print and speech fire warnings.特定的出口指示增强了火灾报警的打印和语音功能。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
BIM and Computer Vision-Based Framework for Fire Emergency Evacuation Considering Local Safety Performance.基于 BIM 和计算机视觉的考虑局部安全性能的火灾应急疏散框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;21(11):3851. doi: 10.3390/s21113851.
5
The verification of wildland-urban interface fire evacuation models.城市与荒野交界处火灾疏散模型的验证
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2023;117(2):1493-1519. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-05913-2. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
6
Simulated fire video collection for advancing understanding of human behavior in building fires.用于增进对建筑火灾中人类行为理解的模拟火灾视频采集。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 26;15:1438020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438020. eCollection 2024.
7
Fire safety and emergency evacuation guidelines for intensive care units and operating theatres: for use in the event of fire, flood, power cut, oxygen supply failure, noxious gas, structural collapse or other critical incidents: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Intensive Care Society.重症监护病房和手术室的消防安全和紧急疏散指南:用于火灾、洪水、停电、氧气供应故障、有毒气体、结构坍塌或其他重大事件:麻醉师协会和重症监护学会的指南。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Oct;76(10):1377-1391. doi: 10.1111/anae.15511. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence.火灾疏散行为中的风险认知再探讨:定义、相关概念及实证证据。
Fire Sci Rev. 2015;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Factors associated with high-rise evacuation: qualitative results from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study.与高层疏散相关的因素:世界贸易中心疏散研究的定性结果。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):165-73. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000460x.
10
An Experimental Test Proposal to Study Human Behaviour in Fires Using Virtual Environments.利用虚拟环境研究火灾中人的行为的实验测试提案。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;20(12):3607. doi: 10.3390/s20123607.

引用本文的文献

1
A Modelling Framework for Householder Decision-Making for Wildfire Emergencies.野火紧急情况下家庭决策的建模框架
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2019 Dec;41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101274.
2
A quantitative comparison of virtual and physical experimental paradigms for the investigation of pedestrian responses in hostile emergencies.敌对紧急情况下行人反应研究的虚拟与物理实验范式的定量比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 22;14(1):6892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55253-9.
3
Roxborough Park Community Wildfire Evacuation Drill: Data Collection and Model Benchmarking.罗克斯伯勒公园社区野火疏散演习:数据收集与模型基准测试
Fire Technol. 2023;59(2):879-901. doi: 10.1007/s10694-023-01371-1. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Burning Down the Silos: Integrating new perspectives from the social sciences into human behavior in fire research.打破壁垒:将社会科学的新视角融入火灾研究中的人类行为
Fire Mater. 2017 Aug-Sep;41(5):389-411. doi: 10.1002/fam.2392. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Science, values, and human judgment.
Science. 1976 Oct 22;194(4263):389-96. doi: 10.1126/science.194.4263.389.
2
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
3
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.理性选择与环境结构
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):129-38. doi: 10.1037/h0042769.
4
Man as an intuitive statistician.作为直观统计学家的人。
Psychol Bull. 1967 Jul;68(1):29-46. doi: 10.1037/h0024722.