Fitzpatrick C, Datta G D, Henderson M, Gray-Donald K, Kestens Y, Barnett T A
Department of Social Sciences, Sainte-Anne University, Church Point, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Exercise Science and PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Jul;41(7):1005-1010. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.39. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Targeting obesogenic features of children's environment that are amenable to change represents a promising strategy for health promotion. The school food environment, defined as the services and policies regarding nutrition and the availability of food in the school and surrounding neighborhood, is particularly important given that students travel through the school neighborhood almost daily and that they consume a substantial proportion of their calories at school.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: As part of the Quebec Adipose and Lifestyle Investigation in Youth (QUALITY) cohort study, we assessed features of school indoor dietary environment and the surrounding school neighborhoods, when children were aged 8-10 years (2005-2008). School principals reported on food practices and policies within the schools. The density of convenience stores and fast-food outlets surrounding the school was computed using a Geographical Information System. Indicators of school neighborhood deprivation were derived from census data. Adiposity outcomes were measured in a clinical setting 2 years later, when participants were aged 10-12 years (2008-2011). We conducted cluster analyses to identify school food environment types. Associations between school types and adiposity were estimated in linear regression models.
Cluster analysis identified three school types with distinct food environments. Schools were characterized as: overall healthful (45%); a healthful food environment in the surrounding neighborhood, but an unhealthful indoor food environment (22%); or overall unhealthful (33%). Less healthful schools were located in more deprived neighborhoods and were associated with greater child adiposity.
Despite regulatory efforts to improve school food environments, there is substantial inequity in dietary environments across schools. Ensuring healthful indoor and outdoor food environments across schools should be included in comprehensive efforts to reduce obesity-related health disparities.
背景/目标:针对儿童环境中易于改变的致肥胖因素是促进健康的一项有前景的策略。学校食物环境被定义为学校及周边社区有关营养和食物供应的服务与政策,鉴于学生几乎每天都会经过学校周边社区,且他们在校摄入相当一部分热量,所以学校食物环境尤为重要。
对象/方法:作为魁北克青少年脂肪与生活方式调查(QUALITY)队列研究的一部分,我们在儿童8至10岁时(2005 - 2008年)评估了学校室内饮食环境及周边学校社区的特征。学校校长汇报了学校内的食物做法和政策。使用地理信息系统计算学校周边便利店和快餐店的密度。学校社区贫困指标来自人口普查数据。两年后在临床环境中测量肥胖结果,此时参与者年龄为10至12岁(2008 - 2011年)。我们进行聚类分析以确定学校食物环境类型。在线性回归模型中估计学校类型与肥胖之间的关联。
聚类分析确定了三种具有不同食物环境的学校类型。学校的特征为:整体健康(45%);周边社区食物环境健康,但室内食物环境不健康(22%);或整体不健康(33%)。健康程度较低的学校位于贫困程度更高的社区,且与儿童肥胖程度更高相关。
尽管为改善学校食物环境做出了监管努力,但各学校的饮食环境仍存在严重不平等。确保所有学校的室内外健康食物环境应纳入减少与肥胖相关的健康差距的综合努力中。