Cook Carly N, Valkan Rebecca S, Mascia Michael B, McGeoch Melodie A
School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Conservation International, Arlington, VA, 22202, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2017 Oct;31(5):1039-1052. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12904. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
The use of total area protected as the predominant indicator of progress in building protected area (PA) networks is receiving growing criticism. Documenting the full dynamics of PA networks, both in terms of the gains and losses in protection, provides a much more informative approach to tracking progress. To this end, documentation of PA downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) has increased. Studies of PADDD events generally fail to place these losses in the context of gains in protection; therefore, they omit important elements of PA network dynamics. To address this limitation, we used a spatially explicit approach to identify every parcel of land added to and excised from the Australian terrestrial PA network and PAs that had their level of protection changed over 17 years (1997-2014). By quantifying changes in the spatial configuration of the PA network with time-series data (spatial layers for nine separate time steps), ours is the first assessment of the dynamics (increases and decreases in area and level of protection) of a PA network and the first comprehensive assessment of PADDD in a developed country. We found that the Australian network was highly dynamic; there were 5233 changes in area or level of protection over 17 years. Against a background of enormous increases in area protected, we identified over 1500 PADDD events, which affected over one-third of the network, which were largely the result of widespread downgrading of protection. We believe our approach provides a mechanism for robust tracking of trends in the world's PAs through the use of data from the World Database on Protected Areas. However, this will require greater transparency and improved data standards in reporting changes to PAs.
将保护区总面积作为衡量保护区(PA)网络建设进展的主要指标,这一做法正受到越来越多的批评。记录PA网络的全面动态,包括保护方面的得失,为跟踪进展提供了一种更具信息量的方法。为此,关于PA降级、缩小规模和解禁(PADDD)的记录有所增加。对PADDD事件的研究通常未能将这些损失置于保护增益的背景下;因此,它们忽略了PA网络动态的重要因素。为解决这一局限性,我们采用了一种空间明确的方法,来识别在17年(1997 - 2014年)间添加到澳大利亚陆地PA网络以及从该网络中移除的每一块土地,以及保护级别发生变化的PA。通过利用时间序列数据(九个不同时间步的空间图层)量化PA网络空间配置的变化,我们首次评估了PA网络的动态(面积和保护级别增减),也是首次对一个发达国家的PADDD进行全面评估。我们发现澳大利亚的网络具有高度动态性;在17年里,面积或保护级别发生了5233次变化。在保护区面积大幅增加的背景下,我们识别出了1500多次PADDD事件,这些事件影响了超过三分之一的网络,主要是保护普遍降级的结果。我们认为,我们的方法通过使用来自世界保护区数据库的数据,为有力跟踪全球保护区趋势提供了一种机制。然而,这需要在报告保护区变化时提高透明度并改进数据标准。