Coley S, Mobley K A, Bone M E, Fell D
Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary.
Br J Anaesth. 1989 Oct;63(4):423-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/63.4.423.
Thirty-six ASA I patients received either propofol 2.25 (0.07) mg kg-1 (mean (SEM] or thiopentone 4.8 (0.18) mg kg-1, for induction of general anaesthesia together with fentanyl and a neuromuscular blocking drug. This technique was repeated in 12 ASA III patients, using propofol 1.8 (0.18) mg kg-1 or thiopentone 4.7 (0.37) mg kg-1. There was a significant decrease in systolic arterial pressure following induction of anaesthesia with both drugs; this was more pronounced after propofol, and in ASA III patients. Plasma noradrenaline concentrations increased after tracheal intubation only in the thiopentone group, but the pressor response to tracheal intubation was not attenuated by the use of propofol.
36例ASA I级患者接受丙泊酚2.25(0.07)mg·kg⁻¹(均值(标准误))或硫喷妥钠4.8(0.18)mg·kg⁻¹用于全身麻醉诱导,同时使用芬太尼和一种神经肌肉阻滞药物。12例ASA III级患者重复该技术,使用丙泊酚1.8(0.18)mg·kg⁻¹或硫喷妥钠4.7(0.37)mg·kg⁻¹。两种药物麻醉诱导后收缩压均显著下降;丙泊酚组下降更明显,且在ASA III级患者中更显著。仅硫喷妥钠组气管插管后血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度升高,但使用丙泊酚并未减弱气管插管的升压反应。