• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Influence of Psychosocial Constructs on the Adherence to Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer in a Prospective, Population-based Cohort.心理社会因素对一项基于人群的前瞻性队列中局部前列腺癌主动监测依从性的影响。
Urology. 2017 May;103:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.063. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer.前列腺癌主动监测的五年全国性随访研究。
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
3
Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.符合前列腺癌研究国际主动监测(PRIAS)方案的比例和不遵守方案者的疾病再分类。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.盖伊和圣托马斯国民保健系统基金会前列腺癌主动监测队列:前列腺癌主动监测数据库的特征。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 19;21(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08255-z.
5
Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.主动监测经筛检发现前列腺癌男性的结局。哥德堡随机人群前列腺癌筛查试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.066. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
6
Selecting men diagnosed with prostate cancer for active surveillance using a risk calculator: a prospective impact study.选择经诊断患有前列腺癌的男性进行主动监测使用风险计算器:一项前瞻性影响研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2):180-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10679.x. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
7
Perception of cancer and inconsistency in medical information are associated with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.癌症认知和医疗信息不一致与决策冲突相关:一项对接受主动监测的前列腺癌男性的初步研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10791.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
8
Using Competing Risk of Mortality to Inform the Transition from Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting.使用死亡竞争风险为前列腺癌主动监测向观察等待的转换提供信息。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1141-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9
Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.肥胖与低危前列腺癌期待管理下的进展风险相关。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):841-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
10
Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.哥德堡随机、基于人群的前列腺癌筛查试验中主动监测的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):760-766. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.048. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.影响前列腺癌积极监测治疗决策和依从性的关键决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):315. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070315.
2
Patient perspectives on factors influencing active surveillance adherence for low-risk prostate cancer: A qualitative study.患者视角下影响低危前列腺癌主动监测依从性的因素:一项定性研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6847. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6847. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
3
Primary Care Physician Perspectives on Low Risk Prostate Cancer Management: Results of a National Survey.基层医疗医生对低风险前列腺癌管理的看法:一项全国性调查的结果
Urol Pract. 2021 Jul;8(4):515-522. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000231. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on the risk of depression and anxiety.前列腺癌主动监测对抑郁和焦虑风险的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17224-w.
5
Why do men with prostate cancer discontinue active surveillance for definitive treatment? A mixed methods investigation.为什么患有前列腺癌的男性会停止接受确定性治疗的主动监测?一项混合方法研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Aug;31(8):1420-1430. doi: 10.1002/pon.5947. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Psychological predictors of delayed active treatment following active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: The Patient REported outcomes for Prostate cARE prospective cohort study.低风险前列腺癌主动监测后延迟积极治疗的心理预测因素:前列腺癌主动监测患者报告结局前瞻性队列研究
BJUI Compass. 2021 Dec 14;3(3):226-237. doi: 10.1002/bco2.124. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Associations of multimorbidity and patient-reported experiences of care with conservative management among elderly patients with localized prostate cancer.老年局限性前列腺癌患者的共病情况及患者对医疗体验与保守治疗的相关性。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(16):6051-6061. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3274. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Making a case "against" focal therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.提出反对针对中危前列腺癌进行聚焦治疗的理由。
World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03303-y. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.在评估前列腺癌真实世界主动监测结果的观察性研究中定义和衡量依从性:一项系统评价
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
10
Observation versus treatment among men with favorable risk prostate cancer in a community-based integrated health care system: a retrospective cohort study.在基于社区的综合医疗保健系统中,对低危前列腺癌男性进行观察与治疗的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0372-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort.前瞻性多机构金丝雀前列腺癌主动监测研究(Canary PASS队列)中临床局限性前列腺癌主动监测的结果。
J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.087. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
Effect of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation against Screening for Prostate Cancer on Incident Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in the United States.美国预防服务工作组D级不建议筛查前列腺癌对美国前列腺癌确诊病例的影响。
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.075. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Increasing use of observation among men at low risk for prostate cancer mortality.在前列腺癌死亡风险较低的男性中,观察的使用越来越多。
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.102. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
4
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.密歇根州低危前列腺癌男性中初始主动监测的当代应用。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
5
A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels.一项关于前列腺癌主动监测对焦虑和痛苦水平影响的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):348-54. doi: 10.1002/pon.3657. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
6
Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer.前列腺癌主动监测的五年全国性随访研究。
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Characteristics and experiences of patients with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program.局部前列腺癌患者退出主动监测计划的特征和经验。
Patient. 2014;7(4):427-36. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0066-z.
8
Using a population-based observational cohort study to address difficult comparative effectiveness research questions: the CEASAR study.利用基于人群的观察性队列研究解决具有挑战性的比较有效性研究问题:CEASAR 研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Jul;2(4):445-60. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.34.
9
Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌治疗后的长期功能结局。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):436-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978.
10
A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.多机构低危前列腺癌主动监测评估
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S19-25; discussion S25. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.023.

心理社会因素对一项基于人群的前瞻性队列中局部前列腺癌主动监测依从性的影响。

The Influence of Psychosocial Constructs on the Adherence to Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer in a Prospective, Population-based Cohort.

作者信息

Lang Maximilian F, Tyson Mark D, Alvarez JoAnn Rudd, Koyama Tatsuki, Hoffman Karen E, Resnick Matthew J, Cooperberg Matthew R, Wu Xiao-Cheng, Chen Vivien, Paddock Lisa E, Hamilton Ann S, Hashibe Mia, Goodman Michael, Greenfield Sheldon, Kaplan Sherrie H, Stroup Antoinette, Penson David F, Barocas Daniel A

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Urology. 2017 May;103:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.063. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.063
PMID:28189554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5410889/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of psychosocial factors such as prostate cancer (PCa) anxiety, social support, participation in medical decision-making (PDM), and educational level on patient decisions to discontinue PCa active surveillance (AS) in the absence of disease progression.

METHODS

The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study is a prospective, population-based cohort study of men with localized PCa diagnosed in 2011-2012. PCa anxiety, social support, PDM, educational level, and patient reasons for discontinuing AS were assessed through patient surveys. A Cox proportional hazards model examined the relationship between psychosocial variables and time to discontinuation of AS.

RESULTS

Of 531 patients on AS, 165 (30.9%) underwent treatment after median follow-up of 37 months. Whereas 69% of patients cited only medical reasons for discontinuing AS, 31% cited at least 1 personal reason, and 8% cited personal reasons only. Patients with some college education discontinued AS significantly earlier (hazard ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.2) than patients with less education. PCa anxiety, social support, and PDM were not associated with seeking treatment.

CONCLUSION

We found that 31% of men who choose AS for PCa discontinue AS within 3 years. Eight percent of men who sought treatment did so in the absence of disease progression. Education, but not psychosocial factors, seems to influence definitive treatment-seeking. Future research is needed to understand how factors unrelated to disease severity influence treatment decisions among patients on AS to identify opportunities to improve adherence to AS.

摘要

目的

评估心理社会因素,如前列腺癌(PCa)焦虑、社会支持、参与医疗决策(PDM)以及教育水平,对患者在疾病未进展情况下决定停止前列腺癌主动监测(AS)的影响。

方法

手术与放疗的比较有效性分析研究是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为2011 - 2012年诊断为局限性PCa的男性。通过患者调查评估PCa焦虑、社会支持、PDM、教育水平以及患者停止AS的原因。采用Cox比例风险模型检验心理社会变量与停止AS时间之间的关系。

结果

在531例接受AS的患者中,165例(30.9%)在中位随访37个月后接受了治疗。69%的患者仅提及停止AS的医学原因,31%的患者至少提及1个个人原因,8%的患者仅提及个人原因。接受过一些大学教育的患者比受教育程度较低的患者更早停止AS(风险比:2.0,95%置信区间:1.2,3.2)。PCa焦虑、社会支持和PDM与寻求治疗无关。

结论

我们发现,选择AS治疗PCa的男性中有31%在3年内停止了AS。8%寻求治疗的男性是在疾病未进展的情况下这样做的。似乎是教育而非心理社会因素影响了寻求确定性治疗的决定。需要进一步研究以了解与疾病严重程度无关的因素如何影响接受AS治疗的患者的治疗决策,从而确定提高对AS依从性的机会。