Loeb Stacy, Folkvaljon Yasin, Makarov Danil V, Bratt Ola, Bill-Axelson Anna, Stattin Pär
Department of Urology, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
Active surveillance (AS) is an important yet underutilized strategy to reduce prostate cancer (PCa) overtreatment.
To examine the 5-yr outcomes of AS in a population-based setting.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, we identified 11 726 men ≤70 yr diagnosed with very low-risk to intermediate-risk PCa from 2003 to 2007 who completed 5 yr of follow-up. Of these men, 1729 (15%) chose AS for the primary management strategy.
We calculated the probability of discontinuation of AS over time, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine factors associated with discontinuation. Reasons for discontinuation were assessed by data extraction from medical charts.
By 5 yr, 64% of the men remained on AS. Predictors of discontinuation were younger age, fewer comorbidities, more education, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and clinical stage T2 disease; marital status did not predict discontinuation. In a subset with data on the reason for discontinuation (86%), 20% of men discontinued because of patient preference, 52% because of PSA progression, 24% because of biopsy progression, and 3% for other reasons.
In a population-based setting, the majority of men remained on AS at 5 yr. However, one-fifth of the men who discontinued AS did so for nonbiologic reasons. Thus, there is a need for support and counseling for men to continue AS in the absence of signs of progression to improve adherence to AS and decrease overtreatment.
Active surveillance (AS) is an important option to delay or avoid treatment for men with favorable prostate cancer features. This study shows that at 5 yr, 64% of men across an entire population remained on AS. We concluded that AS is a durable option and that counseling may be useful to promote adherence for men without progression.
主动监测(AS)是一种重要但未得到充分利用的策略,可减少前列腺癌(PCa)的过度治疗。
在基于人群的环境中研究主动监测5年的结果。
设计、设置和参与者:从瑞典国家前列腺癌登记处,我们确定了2003年至2007年诊断为极低风险至中等风险PCa且年龄≤70岁并完成5年随访的11726名男性。在这些男性中,1729名(15%)选择主动监测作为主要管理策略。
我们计算了随着时间推移停止主动监测的概率,并使用Cox比例风险模型来确定与停止相关的因素。通过从医疗记录中提取数据来评估停止的原因。
到5年时,64%的男性仍在接受主动监测。停止监测的预测因素包括年龄较小、合并症较少、受教育程度较高、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平较高以及临床分期为T2疾病;婚姻状况不能预测停止监测。在有停止监测原因数据的子集中(86%),20%的男性因患者偏好而停止,52%因PSA进展而停止,24%因活检进展而停止,3%因其他原因而停止。
在基于人群的环境中,大多数男性在5年时仍在接受主动监测。然而,五分之一停止主动监测的男性是出于非生物学原因。因此,需要为男性提供支持和咨询,以便在没有进展迹象的情况下继续进行主动监测,以提高对主动监测的依从性并减少过度治疗。
主动监测(AS)是延迟或避免对具有良好前列腺癌特征的男性进行治疗的重要选择。这项研究表明,到5年时,整个人群中64%的男性仍在接受主动监测。我们得出结论,主动监测是一种持久的选择,咨询可能有助于促进无进展男性的依从性。