Dinges Christopher W, Varnon Christopher A, Cota Lisa D, Slykerman Stephen, Abramson Charles I
Laboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Departments of Psychology and Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(2):147-158. doi: 10.1037/xan0000133. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
The current study reports 2 experiments investigating learned helplessness in the honey bee (Apis mellifera ligustica). In Experiment 1, we used a traditional escape method but found the bees' activity levels too high to observe changes due to treatment conditions. The bees were not able to learn in this traditional escape procedure; thus, such procedures may be inappropriate to study learned helplessness in honey bees. In Experiment 2, we used an alternative punishment, or passive avoidance, method to investigate learned helplessness. Using a master and yoked design where bees were trained as either master or yoked and tested as either master or yoked, we found that prior training with unavoidable and inescapable shock in the yoked condition interfered with avoidance and escape behavior in the later master condition. Unlike control bees, learned helplessness bees failed to restrict their movement to the safe compartment following inescapable shock. Unlike learned helplessness studies in other animals, no decrease in general activity was observed. Furthermore, we did not observe a "freezing" response to inescapable aversive stimuli-a phenomenon, thus far, consistently observed in learned helplessness tests with other species. The bees, instead, continued to move back and forth between compartments despite punishment in the incorrect compartment. These findings suggest that, although traditional escape methods may not be suitable, honey bees display learned helplessness in passive avoidance procedures. Thus, regardless of behavioral differences from other species, honey bees can be a unique invertebrate model organism for the study of learned helplessness. (PsycINFO Database Record
当前的研究报告了两项调查意大利蜜蜂(Apis mellifera ligustica)习得性无助的实验。在实验1中,我们使用了传统的逃避方法,但发现蜜蜂的活动水平过高,无法观察到因处理条件而产生的变化。蜜蜂无法在这种传统的逃避程序中学习;因此,此类程序可能不适用于研究蜜蜂的习得性无助。在实验2中,我们使用了一种替代性惩罚或被动回避方法来研究习得性无助。采用主从和配对设计,将蜜蜂训练为主组或配对组,并分别作为主组或配对组进行测试,我们发现,在配对条件下事先接受不可避免且无法逃避的电击训练,会干扰后期主组条件下的回避和逃避行为。与对照蜜蜂不同,习得性无助的蜜蜂在遭受无法逃避的电击后,未能将其活动限制在安全隔室内。与其他动物的习得性无助研究不同,未观察到一般活动的减少。此外,我们没有观察到对无法逃避的厌恶刺激的“僵住”反应——到目前为止,在对其他物种的习得性无助测试中一直观察到这种现象。相反,尽管在错误的隔室内受到惩罚,蜜蜂仍继续在隔室之间来回移动。这些发现表明,虽然传统的逃避方法可能不合适,但蜜蜂在被动回避程序中表现出习得性无助。因此,尽管与其他物种存在行为差异,但蜜蜂可以成为研究习得性无助的独特无脊椎动物模式生物。(PsycINFO数据库记录)