Scadding Guy W, Calderon Moises A, Shamji Mohamed H, Eifan Aarif O, Penagos Martin, Dumitru Florentina, Sever Michelle L, Bahnson Henry T, Lawson Kaitie, Harris Kristina M, Plough Audrey G, Panza Joy Laurienzo, Qin Tielin, Lim Noha, Tchao Nadia K, Togias Alkis, Durham Stephen R
Imperial College, London, and Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rho Federal Systems Division, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
JAMA. 2017 Feb 14;317(6):615-625. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.21040.
Sublingual immunotherapy and subcutaneous immunotherapy are effective in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Three years of continuous treatment with subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy has been shown to improve symptoms for at least 2 years following discontinuation of treatment.
To assess whether 2 years of treatment with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy, compared with placebo, provides improved nasal response to allergen challenge at 3-year follow-up.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-parallel-group study performed in a single academic center, Imperial College London, of adult patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (interfering with usual daily activities or sleep). First enrollment was March 2011, last follow-up was February 2015.
Thirty-six participants received 2 years of sublingual immunotherapy (daily tablets containing 15 µg of major allergen Phleum p 5 and monthly placebo injections), 36 received subcutaneous immunotherapy (monthly injections containing 20 µg of Phleum p 5 and daily placebo tablets) and 34 received matched double-placebo. Nasal allergen challenge was performed before treatment, at 1 and 2 years of treatment, and at 3 years (1 year after treatment discontinuation).
Total nasal symptom scores (TNSS; range; 0 [best] to 12 [worst]) were recorded between 0 and 10 hours after challenge. The minimum clinically important difference for change in TNSS within an individual is 1.08. The primary outcome was TNSS comparing sublingual immunotherapy vs placebo at year 3. Subcutaneous immunotherapy was included as a positive control. The study was not powered to compare sublingual immunotherapy with subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Among 106 randomized participants (mean age, 33.5 years; 34 women [32.1%]), 92 completed the study at 3 years. In the intent-to-treat population, mean TNSS score for the sublingual immunotherapy group was 6.36 (95% CI, 5.76 to 6.96) at pretreatment and 4.73 (95% CI, 3.97 to 5.48) at 3 years, and for the placebo group, the score was 6.06 (95% CI, 5.23 to 6.88) at pretreatment and 4.81 (95% CI, 3.97 to 5.65) at 3 years. The between-group difference (adjusted for baseline) was -0.18 (95% CI, -1.25 to 0.90; [P = .75]).
Among patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis, 2 years of sublingual grass pollen immunotherapy was not significantly different from placebo in improving the nasal response to allergen challenge at 3-year follow-up.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01335139; EudraCT Number: 2010-023536-16.
舌下免疫疗法和皮下免疫疗法对季节性变应性鼻炎有效。皮下免疫疗法和舌下免疫疗法连续治疗三年已显示在治疗中断后至少两年可改善症状。
评估与安慰剂相比,为期两年的草花粉舌下免疫疗法治疗在三年随访时是否能改善鼻腔对变应原激发的反应。
设计、设置和参与者:在伦敦帝国理工学院这一单一学术中心进行的一项随机双盲、安慰剂对照、三平行组研究,纳入患有中度至重度季节性变应性鼻炎(干扰日常活动或睡眠)的成年患者。首次入组时间为2011年3月,末次随访时间为2015年2月。
36名参与者接受为期两年的舌下免疫疗法(每日含15μg主要变应原梯牧草p5的片剂及每月一次的安慰剂注射),36名接受皮下免疫疗法(每月含20μg梯牧草p5的注射剂及每日安慰剂片剂),34名接受匹配的双安慰剂。在治疗前、治疗1年和2年以及3年(治疗中断后1年)进行鼻腔变应原激发试验。
在激发试验后0至10小时记录总鼻症状评分(TNSS;范围:0[最佳]至12[最差])。个体TNSS变化的最小临床重要差异为1.08。主要结局是比较第3年舌下免疫疗法与安慰剂的TNSS。皮下免疫疗法作为阳性对照纳入。该研究未设定足够的效能来比较舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法。
106名随机参与者(平均年龄33.5岁;34名女性[32.1%])中,92名在3年时完成研究。在意向性分析人群中,舌下免疫疗法组治疗前的平均TNSS评分为6.36(95%CI,5.76至6.96),3年时为4.73(95%CI,3.97至5.48),安慰剂组治疗前评分为6.06(95%CI,5.23至6.88),3年时为4.81(95%CI,3.97至5.65)。组间差异(经基线校正)为-0.18(95%CI,-1.25至0.90;[P = 0.75])。
在中度至重度季节性变应性鼻炎患者中,为期两年的舌下草花粉免疫疗法在三年随访时改善鼻腔对变应原激发的反应方面与安慰剂无显著差异。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01335139;欧盟临床试验注册号:2010-023536-16。