1Frontotemporal Disorders Unit & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center,Department of Neurology,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School,Boston,Massachusetts,USA.
2California Pacific Medical Center,Ray Dolby Brain Health Center,San Francisco,California,USA.
CNS Spectr. 2017 Dec;22(6):439-449. doi: 10.1017/S109285291600047X. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) has long been recognized as a heterogeneous illness, with a common clinical presentation of progressive amnesia and less common "atypical" clinical presentations, including syndromes dominated by visual, aphasic, "frontal," or apraxic symptoms. Our knowledge of atypical clinical phenotypes of AD comes from clinicopathologic studies, but with the growing use of in vivo molecular biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology, we are beginning to recognize that these syndromes may not be as rare as once thought. When a clinician is evaluating a patient whose clinical phenotype is dominated by progressive aphasia, complex visual impairment, or other neuropsychiatric symptoms with relative sparing of memory, the differential diagnosis may be broader and a confident diagnosis of an atypical form of AD may require the use of molecular biomarkers. Despite the evolving sophistication in our diagnostic tools, and the acknowledgment of atypical AD syndromes in the 2011 revised diagnostic criteria for AD, the assessment of such patients still poses substantial challenges. We use a case-based approach to review the clinical and imaging phenotypes of a series of patients with typical and atypical AD, and discuss our current approach to their evaluation. One day, we hope that regardless of whether a patient exhibits typical or atypical symptoms of AD pathology, we will be able to identify the condition at a prodromal phase and institute a combination of symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies to support cognitive processes, function, and behavior, and slow or halt progression to dementia.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)一直被认为是一种异质性疾病,具有共同的临床表现为进行性健忘症和较少见的“非典型”临床表现,包括以视觉、失语、“额叶”或失用症状为主的综合征。我们对 AD 的非典型临床表型的了解来自临床病理研究,但随着体内淀粉样蛋白和 tau 病理分子生物标志物的广泛应用,我们开始认识到这些综合征可能并不像以前认为的那样罕见。当临床医生评估以进行性失语、复杂视觉障碍或其他神经精神症状为主且记忆相对保留的患者的临床表型时,鉴别诊断可能更广泛,对非典型 AD 形式的明确诊断可能需要使用分子生物标志物。尽管我们的诊断工具在不断发展和完善,并且在 2011 年 AD 的修订诊断标准中承认了非典型 AD 综合征,但对这些患者的评估仍然存在很大的挑战。我们采用基于病例的方法来回顾一系列具有典型和非典型 AD 的患者的临床和影像学表型,并讨论我们目前对其评估的方法。我们希望有一天,无论患者是否表现出 AD 病理的典型或非典型症状,我们都能够在疾病前期识别出这种情况,并采用对症和疾病修饰治疗相结合的方法来支持认知过程、功能和行为,并减缓或阻止向痴呆的进展。
CNS Spectr. 2017-2-15
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013-12
Brain. 2007-10
NeuroSci. 2022-5-17
Front Neurosci. 2024-1-24
Alzheimers Dement. 2015-11
Lancet Neurol. 2015-1
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013-12
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013-10-16