Phillips Erica, Harris Christina, Lee Wei Wei, Pincavage Amber T, Ouchida Karin, Miller Rachel K, Chaudhry Saima, Arora Vineet M
Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4005-2. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
While there has been increasing emphasis and innovation nationwide in training residents in inpatient handoffs, very little is known about the practice and preparation for year-end clinic handoffs of residency outpatient continuity practices. Thus, the latter remains an identified, yet nationally unaddressed, patient safety concern.
The 2014 annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) survey included seven items for assessing the current year-end clinic handoff practices of internal medicine residency programs throughout the country.
Nationwide survey.
All internal medicine program directors registered with APDIM.
Descriptive statistics of programs and tools used to formulate a year-end handoff in the ambulatory setting, methods for evaluating the process, patient safety and quality measures incorporated within the process, and barriers to conducting year-end handoffs.
Of the 361 APDIM member programs, 214 (59%) completed the Transitions of Care Year-End Clinic Handoffs section of the survey. Only 34% of respondent programs reported having a year-end ambulatory handoff system, and 4% reported assessing residents for competency in this area. The top three barriers to developing a year-end handoff system were insufficient overlap between graduating and incoming residents, inability to schedule patients with new residents in advance, and time constraints for residents, attendings, and support staff.
Most internal medicine programs do not have a year-end clinic handoff system in place. Greater attention to clinic handoffs and resident assessment of this care transition is needed.
尽管全国范围内对住院医师交接班培训的重视和创新不断增加,但对于住院医师门诊连续性诊疗中年终门诊交接班的实践和准备情况却知之甚少。因此,后者仍是一个已被确认但全国范围内尚未解决的患者安全问题。
2014年内科项目主任协会(APDIM)年度调查包括七个项目,用于评估全国内科住院医师项目当前的年终门诊交接班实践。
全国性调查。
所有在APDIM注册的内科项目主任。
用于制定门诊年终交接班的项目和工具的描述性统计、评估该过程的方法、该过程中纳入的患者安全和质量指标,以及进行年终交接班的障碍。
在361个APDIM成员项目中,214个(59%)完成了调查中的“护理转接年终门诊交接班”部分。只有34%的应答项目报告有年终门诊交接班系统,4%的项目报告对住院医师在该领域的能力进行评估。开发年终交接班系统的三大障碍是即将毕业的住院医师与新入职住院医师之间的重叠时间不足、无法提前为新住院医师安排患者,以及住院医师、主治医生和辅助人员的时间限制。
大多数内科项目没有建立年终门诊交接班系统。需要更加关注门诊交接班以及住院医师对这种护理转接的评估。