Sonnenburg Jana, Ryser-Degiorgis Marie-Pierre, Kuiken Thijs, Ferroglio Ezio, Ulrich Rainer G, Conraths Franz J, Gortázar Christian, Staubach Christoph
Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Epidemiology, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald, Insel Riems, Germany.
National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, Building 1-6, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Feb 16;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0935-x.
The need for wildlife health surveillance as part of disease control in wildlife, domestic animals and humans on the global level is widely recognized. However, the objectives, methods and intensity of existing wildlife health surveillance programs vary greatly among European countries, resulting in a patchwork of data that are difficult to merge and compare. This survey aimed at evaluating the need and potential for data harmonization in wildlife health in Europe. The specific objective was to collect information on methods currently used to estimate host abundance and pathogen prevalence. Questionnaires were designed to gather detailed information for three host-pathogen combinations: (1) wild boar and Aujeszky's disease virus, (2) red fox and Echinococcus multilocularis, and (3) common vole and Francisella tularensis.
We received a total of 70 responses from 19 European countries. Regarding host abundance, hunting bags are currently the most widely accessible data source for widely distributed mid-sized and larger mammals such as red fox and wild boar, but we observed large differences in hunting strategies among countries as well as among different regions within countries. For small rodents, trapping is the method of choice, but practical applications vary among study sites. Laboratory procedures are already largely harmonized but information on the sampled animals is not systematically collected.
The answers revealed that a large amount of information is available for the selected host-pathogen pairs and that in theory methods are already largely harmonized. However, the comparability of the data remains strongly compromised by local differences in the way, the methods are applied in practice. While these issues may easily be overcome for prevalence estimation, there is an urgent need to develop tools for the routine collection of host abundance data in a harmonized way. Wildlife health experts are encouraged to apply the harmonized APHAEA protocols in epidemiological studies in wildlife and to increase cooperation.
作为全球野生动物、家畜和人类疾病控制的一部分,野生动物健康监测的必要性已得到广泛认可。然而,欧洲各国现有野生动物健康监测项目的目标、方法和强度差异很大,导致数据拼凑,难以合并和比较。本次调查旨在评估欧洲野生动物健康数据协调的需求和潜力。具体目标是收集有关当前用于估计宿主丰度和病原体流行率的方法的信息。设计了问卷以收集三种宿主 - 病原体组合的详细信息:(1)野猪和奥耶斯基氏病病毒,(2)赤狐和多房棘球绦虫,(3)普通田鼠和土拉弗朗西斯菌。
我们共收到来自19个欧洲国家的70份回复。关于宿主丰度,狩猎记录目前是红狐和野猪等分布广泛的中型及大型哺乳动物最容易获取的数据源,但我们观察到各国之间以及一国不同地区之间的狩猎策略存在很大差异。对于小型啮齿动物,诱捕是首选方法,但不同研究地点的实际应用有所不同。实验室程序在很大程度上已经统一,但关于采样动物的信息并未系统收集。
调查结果表明,对于选定的宿主 - 病原体对,有大量信息可用,并且理论上方法在很大程度上已经统一。然而,数据的可比性仍然因方法在实际应用中的局部差异而受到严重影响。虽然这些问题在流行率估计方面可能很容易克服,但迫切需要开发以统一方式常规收集宿主丰度数据的工具。鼓励野生动物健康专家在野生动物流行病学研究中应用统一的APHAEA协议并加强合作。