IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Jul;36(7):1457-1469. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2667578. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
Computerized segmentation of pathological structures in medical images is challenging, as, in addition to unclear image boundaries, image artifacts, and traces of surgical activities, the shape of pathological structures may be very different from the shape of normal structures. Even if a sufficient number of pathological training samples are collected, statistical shape modeling cannot always capture shape features of pathological samples as they may be suppressed by shape features of a considerably larger number of healthy samples. At the same time, landmarking can be efficient in analyzing pathological structures but often lacks robustness. In this paper, we combine the advantages of landmark detection and deformable models into a novel supervised multi-energy segmentation framework that can efficiently segment structures with pathological shape. The framework adopts the theory of Laplacian shape editing, that was introduced in the field of computer graphics, so that the limitations of statistical shape modeling are avoided. The performance of the proposed framework was validated by segmenting fractured lumbar vertebrae from 3-D computed tomography images, atrophic corpora callosa from 2-D magnetic resonance (MR) cross-sections and cancerous prostates from 3D MR images, resulting respectively in a Dice coefficient of 84.7 ± 5.0%, 85.3 ± 4.8% and 78.3 ± 5.1%, and boundary distance of 1.14 ± 0.49mm, 1.42 ± 0.45mm and 2.27 ± 0.52mm. The obtained results were shown to be superior in comparison to existing deformable model-based segmentation algorithms.
计算机分割医学图像中的病理结构具有挑战性,因为除了图像边界不清晰、图像伪影和手术痕迹之外,病理结构的形状可能与正常结构的形状大不相同。即使收集了足够数量的病理训练样本,统计形状建模也不能总是捕捉到病理样本的形状特征,因为它们可能被大量健康样本的形状特征所抑制。同时,标记可以有效地分析病理结构,但往往缺乏鲁棒性。在本文中,我们将标记检测和可变形模型的优势结合到一个新颖的有监督多能量分割框架中,该框架可以有效地分割具有病理形状的结构。该框架采用了计算机图形学领域引入的拉普拉斯形状编辑理论,从而避免了统计形状建模的局限性。通过对 3D CT 图像中的骨折腰椎、2D MR 横断面上的萎缩胼胝体和 3D MR 图像中的癌变前列腺进行分割,验证了所提出框架的性能,分别得到了 84.7±5.0%、85.3±4.8%和 78.3±5.1%的 Dice 系数和 1.14±0.49mm、1.42±0.45mm 和 2.27±0.52mm 的边界距离。与现有的基于可变形模型的分割算法相比,所获得的结果表现出优越性。