Smith Scott Alan, Yount Naomi, Sorra Joann
Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2078-6.
A number of private and public companies calculate and publish proprietary hospital patient safety scores based on publicly available quality measures initially reported by the U.S. federal government. This study examines whether patient safety culture perceptions of U.S. hospital staff in a large national survey are related to publicly reported patient safety ratings of hospitals.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (Hospital SOPS) assesses provider and staff perceptions of hospital patient safety culture. Consumer Reports (CR), a U.S. based non-profit organization, calculates and shares with its subscribers a Hospital Safety Score calculated annually from patient experience survey data and outcomes data gathered from federal databases. Linking data collected during similar time periods, we analyzed relationships between staff perceptions of patient safety culture composites and the CR Hospital Safety Score and its five components using multiple multivariate linear regressions.
We analyzed data from 164 hospitals, with patient safety culture survey responses from 140,316 providers and staff, with an average of 856 completed surveys per hospital and an average response rate per hospital of 56%. Higher overall Hospital SOPS composite average scores were significantly associated with higher overall CR Hospital Safety Scores (β = 0.24, p < 0.05). For 10 of the 12 Hospital SOPS composites, higher patient safety culture scores were associated with higher CR patient experience scores on communication about medications and discharge.
This study found a relationship between hospital staff perceptions of patient safety culture and the Consumer Reports Hospital Safety Score, which is a composite of patient experience and outcomes data from federal databases. As hospital managers allocate resources to improve patient safety culture within their organizations, their efforts may also indirectly improve consumer-focused, publicly reported hospital rating scores like the Consumer Reports Hospital Safety Score.
许多私营和公共公司根据美国联邦政府最初公布的公开质量指标来计算并发布专有的医院患者安全评分。本研究调查了在一项大型全国性调查中美国医院工作人员对患者安全文化的认知是否与医院公开报告的患者安全评级相关。
医疗保健研究与质量局的医院患者安全文化调查(医院SOPS)评估了医护人员对医院患者安全文化的认知。美国的非营利组织“消费者报告”(CR)根据从联邦数据库收集的患者体验调查数据和结果数据,计算并向其订阅者分享年度医院安全评分。通过链接在相似时间段收集的数据,我们使用多元线性回归分析了工作人员对患者安全文化综合指标的认知与CR医院安全评分及其五个组成部分之间的关系。
我们分析了164家医院的数据,收到了140316名医护人员对患者安全文化调查的回复,每家医院平均有856份完整回复,每家医院的平均回复率为56%。医院SOPS综合平均得分越高,与CR医院安全总分越高显著相关(β = 0.24,p < 0.05)。在12个医院SOPS综合指标中的10个方面,较高的患者安全文化得分与关于药物治疗和出院沟通方面较高的CR患者体验得分相关。
本研究发现医院工作人员对患者安全文化的认知与“消费者报告”医院安全评分之间存在关联,该评分是来自联邦数据库的患者体验和结果数据的综合。当医院管理人员分配资源以改善其组织内的患者安全文化时,他们的努力也可能间接提高以消费者为中心的、公开报告的医院评级分数,如“消费者报告”医院安全评分。