Singer S J, Gaba D M, Geppert J J, Sinaiko A D, Howard S K, Park K C
Center for Health Policy/Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6019, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):112-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.112.
To understand fundamental attitudes towards patient safety culture and ways in which attitudes vary by hospital, job class, and clinical status.
Using a closed ended survey, respondents were questioned on 16 topics important to a culture of safety in health care or other industries plus demographic information. The survey was conducted by US mail (with an option to respond by Internet) over a 6 month period from April 2001 in three mailings.
15 hospitals participating in the California Patient Safety Consortium.
A sample of 6312 employees generally comprising all the hospital's attending physicians, all the senior executives (defined as department head or above), and a 10% random sample of all other hospital personnel. The response rate was 47.4% overall, 62% excluding physicians. Where appropriate, responses were weighted to allow an accurate comparison between participating hospitals and job types and to correct for non-response.
Frequency of responses suggesting an absence of safety culture ("problematic responses" to survey questions) and the frequency of "neutral" responses which might also imply a lack of safety culture. Responses to each question overall were recorded according to hospital, job class, and clinician status.
The mean overall problematic response was 18% and a further 18% of respondents gave neutral responses. Problematic responses varied widely between participating institutions. Clinicians, especially nurses, gave more problematic responses than non-clinicians, and front line workers gave more than senior managers.
Safety culture may not be as strong as is desirable of a high reliability organization. The culture differed significantly, not only between hospitals, but also by clinical status and job class within individual institutions. The results provide the most complete available information on the attitudes and experiences of workers about safety culture in hospitals and ways in which perceptions of safety culture differ among hospitals and between types of personnel. Further research is needed to confirm these results and to determine how senior managers can successfully transmit their commitment to safety to the clinical workplace.
了解对患者安全文化的基本态度,以及态度因医院、工作类别和临床状态而异的方式。
采用封闭式调查问卷,就对医疗保健或其他行业安全文化重要的16个主题以及人口统计学信息对受访者进行询问。该调查于2001年4月开始的6个月内分三次邮寄,通过美国邮政(也可选择通过互联网回复)进行。
15家参与加利福尼亚患者安全联盟的医院。
6312名员工的样本,一般包括医院所有的主治医师、所有高级管理人员(定义为部门主管及以上),以及所有其他医院人员的10%随机样本。总体回复率为47.4%,排除医师后为62%。在适当情况下,对回复进行加权,以便在参与的医院和工作类型之间进行准确比较,并校正无回复情况。
表明缺乏安全文化的回复频率(对调查问卷问题的“有问题回复”)以及可能也暗示缺乏安全文化的“中性”回复频率。根据医院、工作类别和临床医生状态记录对每个问题的总体回复。
总体有问题回复的平均比例为18%,另有18%的受访者给出中性回复。参与机构之间有问题回复差异很大。临床医生,尤其是护士,给出的有问题回复比非临床医生多,一线工作人员比高级管理人员多。
安全文化可能不如高可靠性组织所期望的那样强大。这种文化不仅在医院之间存在显著差异,而且在单个机构内也因临床状态和工作类别而异。这些结果提供了关于医院工作人员对安全文化的态度和经历,以及安全文化认知在医院之间和人员类型之间如何不同的最完整可用信息。需要进一步研究以证实这些结果,并确定高级管理人员如何成功地将他们对安全的承诺传递到临床工作场所。