• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术治疗糖尿病患者。我们现在在哪里,我们应该去哪里?

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. cardiac surgery in diabetic patients. Where are we now and where should we be going?

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.

Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 May-Jun;58(3):178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2017.01.028
PMID:28212871
Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) and have an increased incidence of recurrent events following revascularization. Choosing the most appropriate strategy to revascularize these high-risk patients is crucial for improving the clinical outcomes. Several studies, randomized trials and meta-analyses have compared short- and long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients suffering from CAD. The aim of this article is to review the currently available evidence on the role of PCI and CABG in the management of diabetic patients with CAD.

摘要

糖尿病患者发生冠状动脉疾病 (CAD) 的风险增加,并且在血运重建后复发事件的发生率增加。为了改善临床结局,选择最适合这些高危患者的血运重建策略至关重要。多项研究、随机试验和荟萃分析比较了糖尿病合并 CAD 患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG) 和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的短期和长期结局。本文旨在回顾目前关于 PCI 和 CABG 在糖尿病合并 CAD 患者管理中的作用的证据。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. cardiac surgery in diabetic patients. Where are we now and where should we be going?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术治疗糖尿病患者。我们现在在哪里,我们应该去哪里?
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 May-Jun;58(3):178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
3
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局:6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
5
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.
7
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:六项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
Five-year outcomes of surgical or percutaneous myocardial revascularization in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者心脏旁路手术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 5 年结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1028-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.030. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
9
Revascularization in complex multivessel coronary artery disease after FREEDOM. Is there an indication for PCI and drug-eluting stents?FREEDOM研究后复杂多支冠状动脉疾病的血运重建。是否有PCI及药物洗脱支架的适应证?
Herz. 2016 May;41(3):224-32. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4418-4.
10
Improved long-term survival for diabetic patients with surgical versus interventional revascularization.手术与介入性血管重建术相比,糖尿病患者的长期生存率得到提高。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.035. Epub 2015 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravascular lithotripsy: A novel option for severe calcification of coronary artery.血管内碎石术:冠状动脉严重钙化的新选择。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):e24186. doi: 10.1002/clc.24186. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
2
Impact of prediabetes and duration of diabetes on radial artery atherosclerosis in acute coronary syndrome patients: An optical coherence tomography study.糖尿病前期和糖尿病病程对急性冠状动脉综合征患者桡动脉粥样硬化的影响:一项光学相干断层扫描研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2022 Jan-Feb;19(1):14791641221078108. doi: 10.1177/14791641221078108.
3
CABG versus PCI in the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease in Diabetics: A Literature Review.
冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗糖尿病患者无保护左主干病变的文献综述
Int J Angiol. 2021 Nov 10;30(3):187-193. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735517. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Surgical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.中国 COVID-19 大流行期间糖尿病足溃疡的外科治疗。
J Diabetes Complications. 2020 Sep;34(9):107622. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107622. Epub 2020 May 14.