• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人口统计学特征和特定适应症特征与社交网络参与度的关联有限:来自四个医疗保健支持小组24954名成员的证据。

Demographic and Indication-Specific Characteristics Have Limited Association With Social Network Engagement: Evidence From 24,954 Members of Four Health Care Support Groups.

作者信息

van Mierlo Trevor, Li Xinlong, Hyatt Douglas, Ching Andrew T

机构信息

Research Associate, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Henley-on-Thames, United Kingdom.

Evolution Health Systems Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6330.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.6330
PMID:28213340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5336601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health social networks (DHSNs) are widespread, and the consensus is that they contribute to wellness by offering social support and knowledge sharing. The success of a DHSN is based on the number of participants and their consistent creation of externalities through the generation of new content. To promote network growth, it would be helpful to identify characteristics of superusers or actors who create value by generating positive network externalities.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of developing predictive models that identify potential superusers in real time. This study examined associations between posting behavior, 4 demographic variables, and 20 indication-specific variables.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the custom structured query language (SQL) databases of 4 digital health behavior change interventions with DHSNs. Of these, 2 were designed to assist in the treatment of addictions (problem drinking and smoking cessation), and 2 for mental health (depressive disorder, panic disorder). To analyze posting behavior, 10 models were developed, and negative binomial regressions were conducted to examine associations between number of posts, and demographic and indication-specific variables.

RESULTS

The DHSNs varied in number of days active (3658-5210), number of registrants (5049-52,396), number of actors (1085-8452), and number of posts (16,231-521,997). In the sample, all 10 models had low R values (.013-.086) with limited statistically significant demographic and indication-specific variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Very few variables were associated with social network engagement. Although some variables were statistically significant, they did not appear to be practically significant. Based on the large number of study participants, variation in DHSN theme, and extensive time-period, we did not find strong evidence that demographic characteristics or indication severity sufficiently explain the variability in number of posts per actor. Researchers should investigate alternative models that identify superusers or other individuals who create social network externalities.

摘要

背景

数字健康社交网络(DHSN)广泛存在,人们普遍认为它们通过提供社会支持和知识共享来促进健康。DHSN的成功基于参与者的数量以及他们通过生成新内容持续创造外部效应。为了促进网络增长,识别通过产生积极网络外部效应创造价值的超级用户或参与者的特征会有所帮助。

目的

本研究的目的是调查开发实时识别潜在超级用户的预测模型的可行性。本研究考察了发帖行为、4个人口统计学变量和20个特定适应症变量之间的关联。

方法

数据从4项使用DHSN的数字健康行为改变干预措施的自定义结构化查询语言(SQL)数据库中提取。其中,2项旨在协助治疗成瘾(问题饮酒和戒烟),2项用于心理健康(抑郁症、恐慌症)。为了分析发帖行为,开发了10个模型,并进行负二项回归以检验发帖数量与人口统计学和特定适应症变量之间的关联。

结果

DHSN在活跃天数(3658 - 5210天)、注册人数(5049 - 52396人)、参与者数量(1085 - 8452人)和发帖数量(16231 - 521997条)方面存在差异。在样本中,所有10个模型的R值都很低(0.013 - 0.086),具有统计学意义的人口统计学和特定适应症变量有限。

结论

与社交网络参与相关的变量极少。虽然一些变量具有统计学意义,但它们似乎没有实际意义。基于大量的研究参与者、DHSN主题的差异以及较长的时间段,我们没有找到有力证据表明人口统计学特征或适应症严重程度足以解释每个参与者发帖数量的变异性。研究人员应研究识别超级用户或其他创造社交网络外部效应的个体的替代模型。

相似文献

1
Demographic and Indication-Specific Characteristics Have Limited Association With Social Network Engagement: Evidence From 24,954 Members of Four Health Care Support Groups.人口统计学特征和特定适应症特征与社交网络参与度的关联有限:来自四个医疗保健支持小组24954名成员的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6330.
2
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications.数字健康社交网络中的幂律分布映射:方法、解读及实际意义
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 25;17(6):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4297.
3
The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: an observational study.四个数字健康社交网络中的1%规则:一项观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 4;16(2):e33. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2966.
4
Superusers in social networks for smoking cessation: analysis of demographic characteristics and posting behavior from the Canadian Cancer Society's smokers' helpline online and StopSmokingCenter.net.戒烟社交网络中的超级用户:对加拿大癌症协会吸烟者帮助热线在线平台和戒烟中心网的人口统计学特征及发帖行为的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 26;14(3):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1854.
5
Employing the Gini coefficient to measure participation inequality in treatment-focused Digital Health Social Networks.运用基尼系数衡量以治疗为重点的数字健康社交网络中的参与不平等。
Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform. 2016;5(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s13721-016-0140-7. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
How Online Communities of People With Long-Term Conditions Function and Evolve: Network Analysis of the Structure and Dynamics of the Asthma UK and British Lung Foundation Online Communities.患有长期疾病的人群在线社区如何运作与演变:对英国哮喘与英国肺脏基金会在线社区的结构和动态的网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 11;20(7):e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9952.
7
Online social and professional support for smokers trying to quit: an exploration of first time posts from 2562 members.为试图戒烟的吸烟者提供的在线社交和专业支持:对2562名成员首次发布内容的探索
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Aug 18;12(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1340.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Superusers' Engagement in Asthma Online Communities: Asynchronous Web-Based Interview Study.超级用户参与哮喘在线社区:基于网络的异步访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e18185. doi: 10.2196/18185.
10
Digital recovery networks: Characterizing user participation, engagement, and outcomes of a novel recovery social network smartphone application.数字康复网络:新型康复社交网络智能手机应用中用户参与度、参与度和结果的特征。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Feb;109:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Behavioral Phenotyping Layer for Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Analytics in a Digital Resiliency Course: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.为数字适应能力课程中人工智能驱动的预测分析开发行为表型分析层:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 6;14:e73773. doi: 10.2196/73773.
2
Nudges and Prompts Increase Engagement in Self-Guided Digital Health Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Results From a 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.助推与提示可提高抑郁症和焦虑症自我引导式数字健康治疗的参与度:一项三臂随机对照试验的结果
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 9;8:e52558. doi: 10.2196/52558.
3
Testing Behavioral Nudges and Prompts in Digital Courses for the Self-guided Treatment of Depression and Anxiety: Protocol for a 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.在数字课程中测试行为助推和提示对抑郁症和焦虑症的自我引导治疗:一项三臂随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 15;11(8):e37231. doi: 10.2196/37231.
4
Web-Based Interventions to Help Australian Adults Address Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, and General Mental Well-being: Scoping Review.基于网络的干预措施对澳大利亚成年人应对抑郁、焦虑、自杀意念及总体心理健康的作用:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Feb 8;9(2):e31018. doi: 10.2196/31018.
5
Diabetes Self-Management in the Age of Social Media: Large-Scale Analysis of Peer Interactions Using Semiautomated Methods.社交媒体时代的糖尿病自我管理:使用半自动化方法对同伴互动进行大规模分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 30;8(6):e18441. doi: 10.2196/18441.
6
The Association Between Increased Levels of Patient Engagement With an Internet Support Group and Improved Mental Health Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up: Post-Hoc Analyses From a Randomized Controlled Trial.患者与互联网支持小组互动水平提高与6个月随访时心理健康状况改善之间的关联:一项随机对照试验的事后分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 17;20(7):e10402. doi: 10.2196/10402.
7
How Online Communities of People With Long-Term Conditions Function and Evolve: Network Analysis of the Structure and Dynamics of the Asthma UK and British Lung Foundation Online Communities.患有长期疾病的人群在线社区如何运作与演变:对英国哮喘与英国肺脏基金会在线社区的结构和动态的网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 11;20(7):e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9952.
8
Engagement as a Driver of Growth of Online Health Forums: Observational Study.参与度作为在线健康论坛发展的驱动力:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 29;19(8):e304. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7249.
9
Opening the Black Box of Electronic Health: Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Log Data.打开电子健康的黑匣子:收集、分析和解读日志数据。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Aug 7;6(8):e156. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6452.

本文引用的文献

1
The Panic Center.恐慌中心
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2007 Feb;12(1):49-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00437_3.x.
2
The effect of population aging on health expenditure growth: a critical review.人口老龄化对卫生支出增长的影响:一项批判性综述。
Eur J Ageing. 2013 May 15;10(4):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0280-x. eCollection 2013 Dec.
3
Employing the Gini coefficient to measure participation inequality in treatment-focused Digital Health Social Networks.运用基尼系数衡量以治疗为重点的数字健康社交网络中的参与不平等。
Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform. 2016;5(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s13721-016-0140-7. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
Community Structure of a Mental Health Internet Support Group: Modularity in User Thread Participation.心理健康网络支持群体的社区结构:用户主题参与的模块化。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 May 30;3(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/mental.4961.
5
In Pursuit of Theoretical Ground in Behavior Change Support Systems: Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Communication in a Health-Related Online Community.寻求行为改变支持系统的理论基础:对一个健康相关在线社区中对等交流的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 2;18(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4671.
6
Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?来自网络讨论论坛的健康建议:危险程度如何?
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 6;18(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5051.
7
From Help-Seekers to Influential Users: A Systematic Review of Participation Styles in Online Health Communities.从求助者到有影响力的用户:在线健康社区参与方式的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 1;17(12):e271. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4705.
8
Illness and the Internet: From Private to Public Experience.疾病与互联网:从个人经历到公共体验。
Health (London). 2016 Jan;20(1):22-32. doi: 10.1177/1363459315611941. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Real-Time Assessment of Wellness and Disease in Daily Life.日常生活中健康与疾病的实时评估。
Big Data. 2015 Sep 1;3(3):203-208. doi: 10.1089/big.2015.0016.
10
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications.数字健康社交网络中的幂律分布映射:方法、解读及实际意义
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 25;17(6):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4297.