• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人下腔静脉手术。

Robotic inferior vena cava surgery.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Mar;5(2):194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.08.003
PMID:28214486
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inferior vena cava (IVC) surgery is uncommon and has traditionally been performed through open surgical approaches. Renal cell carcinoma with IVC extension generally requires vena cavotomy and reconstruction. Open removal of malpositioned IVC filters (IVCF) is occasionally required after endovascular retrieval attempts have failed. As our experience with robotic surgery has advanced, we have applied this technology to surgery of the IVC. We reviewed our institution's experience with robotic surgical procedures involving the IVC to determine its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing robotic surgery that included cavotomy and repair from 2011 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were obtained detailing preoperative demographics, operative details, and postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Ten patients (6 men) underwent robotic vena caval procedures at our institution. Seven patients underwent robotic nephrectomy with removal of IVC tumor thrombus and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Three patients underwent robotic explantation of an IVCF after multiple endovascular attempts at removal had failed. The patients with renal cell carcinoma were a mean age of was 65.4 years (range, 55-74 years). Six patients had right-sided malignancy. All patients had T3b lesions at time of diagnosis. Mean tumor length extension into the IVC was 5 cm (range, 1-8 cm). All patients underwent robotic radical nephrectomy, with caval tumor thrombus removal and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The average operative time for patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma was 273 minutes (range, 137-382 minutes). Average intraoperative blood loss was 428 mL (range, 150-1200 mL). The patients with IVCF removal were a mean age of 33 years (range, 24-41 years). Average time from IVCF placement until robotic removal was 35.5 months (range, 4.3-57.3 months). Before robotic IVCF removal, a minimum of two endovascular retrievals were attempted. Average operative time for patients undergoing IVCF removal was 163 minutes (range, 131-202 minutes). Intraoperative blood loss averaged 250 mL (range, 150-350 mL). All procedures were completed robotically. The mean length of stay for all patients was 3.5 days (range, 1-8 days). All patients resumed ambulation on postoperative day 1. Nine patients resumed a regular diet on postoperative day 2. One patient with a renal tumor sustained a colon injury during initial adhesiolysis, before robotic radical nephrectomy, which was recognized at the initial operation and repaired robotically. Robotic radical nephrectomy and caval tumor removal were then completed. No blood transfusions were required intraoperatively, but three patients required blood transfusions postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although robotic IVC surgery is uncommon, our initial limited experience demonstrates it is safe and efficacious.

摘要

目的

下腔静脉(IVC)手术并不常见,传统上采用开放手术方法进行。IVC 外侵的肾细胞癌一般需要进行腔静脉切开和重建。在血管内取出失败后,偶尔需要进行异位 IVC 过滤器(IVCF)的开放式取出。随着我们在机器人手术方面的经验不断提高,我们已经将这项技术应用于 IVC 手术。我们回顾了本机构在涉及 IVC 的机器人手术程序方面的经验,以确定其安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年至 2014 年间接受机器人手术且包括腔切开和修复的所有患者。详细获取术前人口统计学,手术细节以及术后发病率和死亡率的数据。

结果

本机构有 10 名患者(6 名男性)接受了机器人腔静脉手术。7 名患者接受了机器人肾切除术,切除了 IVC 肿瘤栓子和腹膜后淋巴结清扫术。3 名患者在多次血管内尝试取出失败后,接受了机器人取出 IVCF。肾细胞癌患者的平均年龄为 65.4 岁(范围,55-74 岁)。6 名患者有右侧恶性肿瘤。所有患者在诊断时均为 T3b 病变。肿瘤在 IVC 内的平均延伸长度为 5cm(范围,1-8cm)。所有患者均接受了机器人根治性肾切除术,切除了腔静脉肿瘤栓子和腹膜后淋巴结清扫术。接受肾细胞癌手术的患者的平均手术时间为 273 分钟(范围,137-382 分钟)。术中平均出血量为 428ml(范围,150-1200ml)。取出 IVCF 的患者平均年龄为 33 岁(范围,24-41 岁)。从 IVCF 放置到机器人取出的平均时间为 35.5 个月(范围,4.3-57.3 个月)。在机器人取出 IVCF 之前,至少尝试了两次血管内取出。取出 IVCF 的患者的平均手术时间为 163 分钟(范围,131-202 分钟)。术中平均出血量为 250ml(范围,150-350ml)。所有手术均在机器人下完成。所有患者的平均住院时间为 3.5 天(范围,1-8 天)。所有患者均在术后第 1 天恢复行走。9 名患者在术后第 2 天恢复常规饮食。1 名患有肾肿瘤的患者在机器人根治性肾切除术之前的初始粘连松解过程中发生了结肠损伤,这在初次手术时就被发现,并通过机器人进行了修复。然后完成了机器人根治性肾切除术和腔静脉肿瘤切除术。术中无需输血,但 3 名患者术后需要输血。

结论

尽管机器人 IVC 手术并不常见,但我们的初步经验表明其是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Robotic inferior vena cava surgery.机器人下腔静脉手术。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Mar;5(2):194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
2
Robotic-assisted Radical Nephrectomy With Retrohepatic Vena Caval Tumor Thrombectomy (Level III) Combined With Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection.机器人辅助根治性肾切除术联合肝后腔静脉肿瘤血栓切除术(Ⅲ级)并扩大腹膜后淋巴结清扫术
Urology. 2015 Dec;86(6):1235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.042. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
Multi-Institutional Experience with Robotic Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy.机器人辅助肾切除术联合下腔静脉肿瘤血栓切除术的多机构经验
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):865-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.094. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
4
Initial Series of Robotic Segmental Inferior Vena Cava Resection in Left Renal Cell Carcinoma With Caval Tumor Thrombus.机器人辅助左肾癌合并下腔静脉瘤栓节段性切除术的初步系列报道。
Urology. 2020 Aug;142:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.053. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Vascular stapling of the inferior vena cava: further refinement of techniques for the excision of extensive renal cell carcinoma with unresectable vena-caval involvement.下腔静脉血管吻合术:用于切除伴有不可切除的腔静脉受累的广泛肾细胞癌的技术进一步改进。
Urology. 2009 Oct;74(4):846-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.075. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
6
Advances in Robotic Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Intracaval Balloon Occlusion, Patch Grafting, and Vena Cavoscopy.机器人腔静脉肿瘤血栓切除术的进展:腔内心脏球囊阻断、补片移植和腔静脉镜检查。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):884-890. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.024. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Robotic Level III IVC Tumor Thrombectomy: Duplicating the Open Approach.机器人辅助下腔静脉三级肿瘤血栓切除术:复制开放手术方法。
Urology. 2016 Apr;90:204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Robotic Left-sided Level II Caval Thrombectomy and Nephrectomy Using a Novel Supine, Single-dock Approach: Primary Description.使用新型仰卧单入路方法的机器人辅助左侧二级腔静脉血栓切除术和肾切除术:初步描述
Urology. 2018 Feb;112:205-208. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
Laparoscopic-assisted nephrectomy with inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: preliminary results.腹腔镜辅助肾切除术联合下腔静脉肿瘤血栓切除术:初步结果
Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.044.
10
Robotic Radical Left Nephrectomy With Inferior Vena Cava Level III Thrombectomy.机器人辅助下根治性左肾切除术伴下腔静脉三级血栓切除术
Urology. 2017 Sep;107:269. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.043. Epub 2017 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Intravenous Tumor Thrombus: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Approaches.用于治疗伴有静脉瘤栓的肾细胞癌的微创外科技术:腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术方法的系统评价
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 28;32(5):256. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050256.
2
Robot-assisted vascular surgery: literature review, clinical applications, and future perspectives.机器人辅助血管手术:文献综述、临床应用及未来展望。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 23;18(1):328. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02087-2.
3
Successful experiences and feasible techniques of robotic-assisted inferior vena cava filter retrieval after failure of endovascular attempts: a case report.
血管内尝试失败后机器人辅助下腔静脉滤器取出的成功经验与可行技术:病例报告
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):519-523. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-513. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
First Robotic Hepatectomy With Middle Hepatic Vein Reconstruction Using ePTFE Graft for Hepatic Adenoma: A Case Report.首例使用ePTFE移植物进行肝中静脉重建的机器人肝切除术治疗肝腺瘤:病例报告
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 14;9:904253. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.904253. eCollection 2022.