Cheng Gong, Ni Dong, Liang Huageng, Zhang Xiaoping
Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Institute of Urologic Surgery, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):519-523. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-513. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
The mainstay of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval has been snare techniques. However, caval penetration or filter fracture makes endovascular approaches challenging, which in turn leads to more aggressive attempts, including open surgical procedures. The fact that laparoscopic approaches (especially the da Vinci robotic system) with minimal invasion allow for equivalent long-term outcomes as compared with open procedures is encouraging. To date, few centers have attempted secondary minimal invasive operation after filter retrieval failure. In this study, we presented a case of robot-assisted filter retrieval after failure of snare techniques. The operative time was 55 minutes, which was the shortest time reported in the collected studies thus far.
A 27-year-old female was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis after delivery and placement of an IVC filter. Local surgeons tried endovascular approaches to retrieve the filter, but failed twice. She was then transferred to our hospital and computed tomography venography revealed that the filter struts had protruded outside the cava wall. Based on our previous experiences of robotic surgery with vena cava graft replacement, we decided to perform robotic-assisted filter retrieval. The operation was successful, and the estimated blood loss was less than 50 mL. The patient was discharged 5 days after the operation and presented for reexamination 6 months later. Ultrasound showed that the IVC blood flow was smooth. No complications occurred, and the renal function was nearly normal.
Filter retrieval failure through the endovascular approach is challenging, and occasionally, open surgery is needed as a second attempt. With the advancement of laparoscopic approaches, especially the enhanced ergonomics of the robotic system, aggressive operation can be avoided, and robotic-assisted filter retrieval can offer an alternative for surgeons to manage these issues.
下腔静脉(IVC)滤器取出的主要方法一直是圈套技术。然而,腔静脉穿透或滤器断裂使血管内入路具有挑战性,这进而导致更激进的尝试,包括开放手术。与开放手术相比,微创的腹腔镜入路(尤其是达芬奇机器人系统)能产生相当的长期效果,这一事实令人鼓舞。迄今为止,很少有中心在滤器取出失败后尝试二次微创手术。在本研究中,我们报告了1例圈套技术失败后机器人辅助滤器取出的病例。手术时间为55分钟,这是迄今为止所收集研究中报告的最短时间。
一名27岁女性在产后被诊断为深静脉血栓形成并植入了IVC滤器。当地外科医生尝试通过血管内入路取出滤器,但两次均失败。随后她被转诊至我院,计算机断层静脉造影显示滤器支柱已突出到腔静脉壁外。基于我们之前进行腔静脉移植机器人手术的经验,我们决定实施机器人辅助滤器取出术。手术成功,估计失血量少于50毫升。患者术后5天出院,6个月后前来复查。超声显示IVC血流顺畅。未发生并发症,肾功能基本正常。
通过血管内入路取出滤器失败具有挑战性,偶尔需要进行开放手术作为二次尝试。随着腹腔镜入路的发展,尤其是机器人系统人体工程学的改进,可以避免激进的手术,机器人辅助滤器取出可为外科医生处理这些问题提供一种替代方法。