Ishai Reuven, Herrmann Barbara S, Nadol Joseph B, Quesnel Alicia M
Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Hear Res. 2017 May;348:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
An inflammatory tissue reaction around the electrode array of a cochlear implant (CI) is common, in particular at the electrode insertion region (cochleostomy) where mechanical trauma often occurs. However, the factors determining the amount and causes of fibrous reaction surrounding the stimulating electrode, especially medially near the perimodiolar location, are unclear. Temporal bone (TB) specimens from patients who had undergone cochlear implantation during life with either Advanced Bionics (AB) Clarion ™ or HiRes90K™ (Sylmar, CA, USA) devices that have a half-band and a pre-curved electrode, or Cochlear ™ Nucleus (Sydney, Australia) device that have a full-band and a straight electrode were evaluated. The thickness of the fibrous tissue surrounding the electrode array of both types of CI devices at both the lower (LB) and upper (UB) basal turns of the cochlea was quantified at three locations: the medial, inferior, and superior aspects of the sheath. Fracture of the osseous spiral lamina and/or marked displacement of the basilar membrane were interpreted as evidence of intracochlear trauma. In addition, post-operative word recognition scores, duration of implantation, and post-operative programming data were evaluated. Seven TBs from six patients implanted with AB devices and five TBs from five patients implanted with Nucleus devices were included. A fibrous capsule around the stimulating electrode array was present in all twelve specimens. TBs implanted with AB device had a significantly thicker fibrous capsule at the medial aspect than at the inferior or superior aspects at both locations (LB and UB) of the cochlea (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, p < 0.01). TBs implanted with a Nucleus device had no difference in the thickness of the fibrous capsule surrounding the track of the electrode array (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, p > 0.05). Nine of fourteen (64%) basal turns of the cochlea (LB and UB of seven TBs) implanted with AB devices demonstrated intracochlear trauma compared to two of ten (20%) basal turns of the cochlea (LB and UB of five TBs) with Nucleus devices, (Fisher exact test, p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the thickness of the fibrous tissue and the duration of implantation or the word recognition scores (Spearman rho, p = 0.06, p = 0.4 respectively). Our outcomes demonstrated the development of a robust fibrous tissue sheath medially closest to the site of electric stimulation in cases implanted with the AB device electrode, but not in cases implanted with the Nucleus device. The cause of the asymmetric fibrous sheath may be multifactorial including insertional trauma, a foreign body response, and/or asymmetric current flow.
人工耳蜗(CI)电极阵列周围的炎症组织反应很常见,尤其是在经常发生机械创伤的电极插入区域(蜗窗造口术)。然而,决定刺激电极周围纤维反应的数量和原因的因素尚不清楚,尤其是在靠近蜗轴位置的内侧。对生前接受过人工耳蜗植入的患者的颞骨(TB)标本进行了评估,这些患者植入的是具有半带和预弯曲电极的先进生物电子(AB)Clarion™或HiRes90K™(美国加利福尼亚州西尔玛)设备,或具有全带和直电极的科利耳™ Nucleus(澳大利亚悉尼)设备。在耳蜗的下(LB)和上(UB)基底转的三个位置对两种CI设备电极阵列周围的纤维组织厚度进行了量化:护套的内侧、下方和上方。骨螺旋板骨折和/或基底膜明显移位被解释为蜗内创伤的证据。此外,还评估了术后单词识别分数、植入持续时间和术后编程数据。纳入了6例植入AB设备的患者的7个TB和5例植入Nucleus设备的患者的5个TB。所有12个标本中均存在刺激电极阵列周围的纤维囊。植入AB设备的TB在耳蜗的两个位置(LB和UB)的内侧方面的纤维囊明显比下方或上方厚(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,p <0.01)。植入Nucleus设备的TB在电极阵列轨迹周围的纤维囊厚度没有差异(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,p>0.05)。与植入Nucleus设备的耳蜗的10个基底转中的2个(5个TB的LB和UB)(20%)相比,植入AB设备的耳蜗的14个基底转中的9个(7个TB的LB和UB)(64%)显示出蜗内创伤(Fisher精确检验,p <0.05)。纤维组织厚度与植入持续时间或单词识别分数之间没有显著相关性(Spearman秩相关系数,p分别为0.06和0.4)。我们的结果表明,在植入AB设备电极的情况下,在最靠近电刺激部位的内侧会形成强大的纤维组织鞘,但在植入Nucleus设备的情况下则不会。不对称纤维鞘的原因可能是多因素的,包括插入创伤、异物反应和/或不对称电流。