Mullen Kathleen J, Staubli Stefan
RAND and IZA.
University of Calgary, RAND and NBER.
J Public Econ. 2016 Nov;143:49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
A key component for estimating the optimal size and structure of disability insurance (DI) programs is the elasticity of DI claiming with respect to benefit generosity. Yet, in many countries, including the United States, all workers face identical benefit schedules, which are a function of one's labor market history, making it difficult to separate the effect of the benefit level from the effect of unobserved preferences for work on individuals' claiming decisions. To circumvent this problem, we exploit exogenous variation in DI benefits in Austria arising from several reforms to its DI and old age pension system in the 1990s and 2000s. We use comprehensive administrative social security records data on the universe of Austrian workers to compute benefit levels under six different regimes, allowing us to identify and precisely estimate the elasticity of DI claiming with respect to benefit generosity. We find that, over this time period, a one percent increase in potential DI benefits was associated with a 1.2 percent increase in DI claiming.
估计残疾保险(DI)计划的最优规模和结构的一个关键要素是DI申领率相对于福利慷慨程度的弹性。然而,在包括美国在内的许多国家,所有工人都面临相同的福利计划,该计划是个人劳动力市场历史的函数,这使得难以将福利水平的影响与未观察到的工作偏好对个人申领决策的影响区分开来。为规避这一问题,我们利用了奥地利DI申领福利的外生变化,这种变化源于20世纪90年代和21世纪初对其DI和养老金体系的几次改革。我们使用奥地利全体工人的综合行政社会保障记录数据,计算六种不同制度下的福利水平,从而使我们能够识别并精确估计DI申领率相对于福利慷慨程度的弹性。我们发现,在这一时期,潜在DI福利增加1%会使DI申领率增加1.2%。