• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管壁厚度作为 Steinstrasse 非侵入性治疗成功的预测指标。我们能否节省时间?

Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?

机构信息

Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Urology Department, Horus University, New Damietta, Egypt.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04874-w.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-04874-w
PMID:38478098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10937774/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to define factors affecting the non-invasive overall treatment success (medical expulsive therapy (MET) ± shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)) for uncomplicated ureteral steinstrasse (SS) clearance.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent SWL for renal stones between 2017 and 2021. Patients with uncomplicated SS were included. All patient's demographic and radiological data, e.g., age, gender, pre-SWL stenting, SS site, type, leading stone size in widest diameter (< 10 mm and ≥ 10 mm), ureteral wall thickness (UWT) in mm against the leading stone were collected. If SS was diagnosed, medical treatment was given for 4 weeks. In case of MET failure, either SWL for the leading stones + MET or direct URS was done. Non-invasive treatment success (SFR) was considered if complete clearance of SS occurred with no complications or the need for invasive intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included with mean age of 45.9 ± 12.4 years. SFR in case of MET only occurred in 27.9%. Complications happened in 26 patients (17.9%). Non-invasive treatment SFR was achieved in 78 patients (53.8%) totally where SS type I, leading stone size ≤ 10 mm type and decreased UWT around the leading stone increased treatment success.

CONCLUSION

Ureteral wall thickness is an important factor predicting SS management success. Besides the decreased UWT, non-invasive management should be offered for type I SS with leading stone ≤ 10 mm.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定影响无创整体治疗成功(药物排石治疗(MET)±冲击波碎石术(SWL))的因素,以清除单纯输尿管石街(SS)。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 2017 年至 2021 年间接受 SWL 治疗肾结石的连续患者。纳入单纯 SS 患者。收集所有患者的人口统计学和影像学数据,如年龄、性别、SWL 术前支架置入、SS 部位、类型、主导结石最大直径(<10mm 和≥10mm)、输尿管壁厚度(mm)与主导结石相对应。如果诊断为 SS,则给予 4 周的药物治疗。如果 MET 失败,要么对主导结石进行 SWL+MET,要么直接进行输尿管镜检查。如果 SS 完全清除且无并发症或需要侵入性干预,则认为无创治疗成功(SFR)。

结果

共纳入 145 例患者,平均年龄为 45.9±12.4 岁。仅 MET 的 SFR 为 27.9%。26 例患者出现并发症(17.9%)。总共有 78 例患者(53.8%)实现了无创治疗 SFR,其中 SS 类型 I、主导结石大小≤10mm 类型和降低的主导结石周围输尿管壁厚度增加了治疗成功率。

结论

输尿管壁厚度是预测 SS 管理成功的重要因素。除了降低的 UWT 外,对于主导结石≤10mm 的 I 型 SS 应提供无创治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d4/10937774/6ff8ed3ef0d0/345_2024_4874_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d4/10937774/6ff8ed3ef0d0/345_2024_4874_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d4/10937774/6ff8ed3ef0d0/345_2024_4874_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?输尿管壁厚度作为 Steinstrasse 非侵入性治疗成功的预测指标。我们能否节省时间?
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04874-w.
2
Steinstrasse predictive factors and outcomes after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术治疗后 Steinstrasse 的预测因素和结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):477-82. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000400006.
3
Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.影响成人患者体外冲击波碎石术治疗大于 1cm 的近端输尿管结石成功率的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Feb;49(1):51-56. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01186-7. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
4
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
5
A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.一种利用计算机断层扫描参数预测不同部位输尿管结石碎石术成功的新模型。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases.体外冲击波碎石术作为儿童尿路结石的一线治疗方法:500 例病例的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0133-0. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
7
Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided shockwave lithotripsy and predictors of its success rate in pediatric population: A report from a national reference center.超声引导下冲击波碎石术治疗小儿尿路结石的疗效及影响其碎石成功率的因素:来自国家参考中心的报告。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Feb;17(1):78.e1-78.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Can shock wave lithotripsy lead to impaction of ureteral stones?冲击波碎石术会导致输尿管结石嵌顿吗?
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Feb;75(1):85-91. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04278-8. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest.输尿管壁厚度是影响髂嵴以上输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石治疗成功的独立参数。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14264. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14264. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Ureteral wall thickness at the ureterovesical junction as a significant factor in predicting medical expulsive therapy of ureterovesical junction stones.输尿管膀胱连接处的输尿管壁厚度是预测输尿管膀胱连接处结石药物排石治疗效果的重要因素。
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01890-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline of the guidelines: urolithiasis.指南指南:尿石症。
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):125-129. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000855.
2
Role of pretreatment Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of factors affecting stone-clearance post-shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a prospective study.预处理多普勒超声在预测影响输尿管结石碎石术后结石清除因素中的作用:一项前瞻性研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Sep;52(9):1643-1649. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02465-3. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
3
Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report.
输尿管壁厚度作为预测≤10mm 输尿管结石自行排出的重要因素:初步报告。
World J Urol. 2019 May;37(5):913-919. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2461-x. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Medical Expulsive Therapy in Urolithiasis: A Review of the Quality of the Current Evidence.医学排石疗法在尿路结石病中的应用:当前证据质量的综述。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Feb;3(1):27-45. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 27.
5
Ureteral Wall Thickness as a Preoperative Indicator of Impacted Stones in Patients With Ureteral Stones Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.输尿管壁厚度作为输尿管结石患者行输尿管镜碎石术前结石嵌顿的指标
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?我们能否预测冲击波碎石术后“石街”形成时干预治疗的必要性?
Urol Ann. 2017 Jan-Mar;9(1):51-54. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.198870.
7
EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的诊断和保守治疗管理。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL.输尿管结石嵌顿部位的输尿管壁厚度:体外冲击波碎石术后成功率的关键预测指标。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):83-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0724-6. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
9
Tamsulosin as an expulsive therapy for steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study.坦索罗辛作为体外冲击波碎石术后石街的排石疗法:一项随机对照研究。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010 Nov;44(5):315-9. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.494616. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
10
Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications?冲击波碎石术前放置输尿管支架是否会影响对“石街”进行干预的必要性及相关并发症?
Urol Int. 2009;83(2):222-5. doi: 10.1159/000230028. Epub 2009 Sep 10.