Rode Julian, Wittmer Heidi, Emerton Lucy, Schröter-Schlaack Christoph
Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Dept. of Environmental Politics, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Environment Management Group, Sri Lanka.
J Nat Conserv. 2016 Sep;33:35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2016.07.001.
Economic instruments that promise "win-win" solutions for both biodiversity conservation and human livelihoods have become increasingly popular over recent years. There however remains a gap in terms of practical and policy-relevant guidance about appropriate approaches that take into account the local needs and the specific cultural, legal, and ecological context in which such instruments are being developed and applied. This paper presents a step-by-step framework that helps conservation and development planners and practitioners to identify economic instruments that can promote pro-conservation behaviour in a specific setting. The concept of 'ecosystem service opportunities' builds on, and brings together, general economic principles and an ecosystem services perspective. The framework was designed to also address a number of concerns regarding economic approaches in order to help practitioners recognise the potentials and limits of economic approaches to nature conservation. The framework is illustrated by its application within the realm of a biodiversity conservation project in Thailand.
近年来,那些承诺为生物多样性保护和人类生计带来“双赢”解决方案的经济手段越来越受欢迎。然而,在考虑当地需求以及此类手段开发和应用所处的特定文化、法律和生态背景的适当方法方面,在实践和政策相关指导上仍存在差距。本文提出了一个循序渐进的框架,帮助保护和发展规划者及从业者识别能够在特定环境中促进有利于保护行为的经济手段。“生态系统服务机会”的概念建立在一般经济原则和生态系统服务视角的基础之上,并将二者结合起来。该框架的设计还旨在解决一些与经济方法相关的问题,以帮助从业者认识到经济方法在自然保护方面的潜力和局限性。本文通过该框架在泰国一个生物多样性保护项目中的应用进行说明。