Suppr超能文献

有多少种肌张力障碍?临床证据。

How Many Dystonias? Clinical Evidence.

作者信息

Albanese Alberto

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2017 Feb 3;8:18. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00018. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Literary reports on dystonia date back to post-Medieval times. Medical reports are instead more recent. We review here the early descriptions and the historical establishment of a consensus on the clinical phenomenology and the diagnostic features of dystonia syndromes. Lumping and splitting exercises have characterized this area of knowledge, and it remains largely unclear how many dystonia types we are to count. This review describes the history leading to recognize that focal dystonia syndromes are a coherent clinical set encompassing cranial dystonia (including blepharospasm), oromandibular dystonia, spasmodic torticollis, truncal dystonia, writer's cramp, and other occupational dystonias. Papers describing features of dystonia and diagnostic criteria are critically analyzed and put into historical perspective. Issues and inconsistencies in this lumping effort are discussed, and the currently unmet needs are critically reviewed.

摘要

关于肌张力障碍的文献报道可追溯到中世纪之后。而医学报告则相对较新。我们在此回顾肌张力障碍综合征的早期描述以及关于其临床现象学和诊断特征的共识的历史确立过程。分类和细分的工作一直是这一知识领域的特点,而且我们到底应该算有多少种肌张力障碍类型在很大程度上仍不明确。这篇综述描述了认识到局灶性肌张力障碍综合征是一个连贯的临床组群的历史过程,该组群包括颅肌张力障碍(包括眼睑痉挛)、口下颌肌张力障碍、痉挛性斜颈、躯干肌张力障碍、书写痉挛以及其他职业性肌张力障碍。对描述肌张力障碍特征和诊断标准的论文进行了批判性分析并置于历史背景中。讨论了这种分类工作中的问题和不一致之处,并对当前未满足的需求进行了批判性审视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09fb/5289979/2d1788b1e48a/fneur-08-00018-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验