Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Feb;70(2):275-283. doi: 10.1002/acr.23220. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Peer-led support groups are an important resource for many people with scleroderma (systemic sclerosis; SSc). Little is known, however, about barriers to participation. The objective of this study was to identify reasons why some people with SSc do not participate in SSc support groups.
A 21-item survey was used to assess reasons for nonattendance among SSc patients in Canada and the US. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted, using the software MPlus 7, to group reasons for nonattendance into themes.
A total of 242 people (202 women) with SSc completed the survey. EFA results indicated that a 3-factor model best described the data (χ [150] = 302.7; P < 0.001; Comparative Fit Index = 0.91, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.88, root mean square error of approximation = 0.07, factor intercorrelations 0.02-0.43). The 3 identified themes, reflecting reasons for not attending SSc support groups were personal reasons (9 items; e.g., already having enough support), practical reasons (7 items; e.g., no local support groups available), and beliefs about support groups (5 items; e.g., support groups are too negative). On average, respondents rated 4.9 items as important or very important reasons for nonattendance. The 2 items most commonly rated as important or very important were 1) already having enough support from family, friends, or others, and 2) not knowing of any SSc support groups offered in my area.
SSc organizations may be able to address limitations in accessibility and concerns about SSc support groups by implementing online support groups, better informing patients about support group activities, and training support group facilitators.
同伴支持小组是许多硬皮病(系统性硬皮病;SSc)患者的重要资源。然而,对于参与障碍知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定为什么有些 SSc 患者不参加 SSc 支持小组。
使用 21 项问卷调查评估加拿大和美国 SSc 患者不参加的原因。使用 MPlus 7 软件进行探索性因素分析(EFA),将不参加的原因分组为主题。
共有 242 名(202 名女性)SSc 患者完成了调查。EFA 结果表明,三因素模型最能描述数据(χ[150]=302.7;P<0.001;比较拟合指数=0.91,塔克-刘易斯指数=0.88,均方根误差逼近=0.07,因子相关性 0.02-0.43)。三个确定的主题,反映了不参加 SSc 支持小组的原因是个人原因(9 项;例如,已经有足够的支持)、实际原因(7 项;例如,没有当地的支持小组)和对支持小组的信念(5 项;例如,支持小组太消极)。平均而言,受访者将 4.9 项评为不参加的重要或非常重要原因。被评为重要或非常重要的两个项目是:1)已经从家人、朋友或其他人那里获得了足够的支持,2)不知道我所在地区有任何 SSc 支持小组。
SSc 组织可以通过实施在线支持小组、更好地告知患者有关支持小组活动的信息以及培训支持小组的协调员,来解决可及性方面的限制和对 SSc 支持小组的担忧。